An Israeli plane bombs a target in Syria. The news is passed along first to Fox News, (huh?) by someone in the Administration.
It
happened on a Thursday, but we only find out about it late on Friday.
The New York Times assigns three reporters to cover the story that goes
up on their website in the middle of the morning on Saturday.
Earlier
that day, President Obama, speaking in Costa Rica, said there will be
no US ground troops on the ground in Syria. Now, the Administration says
it is considering “military options.”
Saturday’s New York Times chooses this story for its first page: “ISRAEL TIGHTENS BORDER DEFENSE AS SYRIA ERUPTS.”
And
so, the story is reframed with Israel pictured as the defender, not the
aggressor. The bombing makes it into the third paragraph of that story
on page 1 but refers only to the bombing of “a target.”
Their earlier story has now been moved by the Times deeper into the paper, to the bottom of page 10. That headline reads: “ISRAEL BOMBS SYRIA as the US Considers Its Own Military Options.”
The
report: “American officials did not provide details on the target but,
instead, referenced an earlier attack attacking a Syrian military supply
effort to Hezbollah.” Unmentioned is that the original report
understated the extent of the damage in Syria caused by Israeli bombing.
Reuters was better informed, “Israel has carried out an air strike targeting a shipment of missiles in Syria bound for Hezbollah in neighboring Lebanon.Read more
No comments:
Post a Comment