This would be comical if the situation in Syria wasn’t so serious. This reporting, via the
New York Times,
shows the complete inability to understand that Washington isn’t
the arbiter of what happens inside Syria. Nor should it be. This is
ineptitude framed as serious policy. Besides, there are
countless forces backing the “rebels” and
they’re mostly dictatorships. Nowhere in the calculations is a serious effort towards negotiations and a less militarised environment:
This would be comical if the situation in Syria wasn’t so serious. This reporting, via the
New York Times,
shows the complete inability to understand that Washington isn’t the
arbiter of what happens inside Syria. Nor should it be. This is
ineptitude framed as serious policy. Besides, there are countless forces
backing the “rebels” and
they’re mostly dictatorships. Nowhere in the calculations is a serious effort towards negotiations and a less militarised environment:
Confronted with evidence that chemical weapons have been used in Syria, President Obama now finds himself in a geopolitical box, his credibility at stake with frustratingly few good options.
The
origins of this dilemma can be traced in large part to a weekend last
August, when alarming intelligence reports suggested the
besieged Syrian government might be preparing to use chemical
weapons. After months of keeping a distance from the conflict, Mr.
Obama felt he had to become more directly engaged.
This would be comical if the situation in Syria wasn’t so serious. This reporting, via the
New York Times,
shows the complete inability to understand that Washington isn’t the
arbiter of what happens inside Syria. Nor should it be. This is
ineptitude framed as serious policy. Besides, there are countless forces
backing the “rebels” and
they’re mostly dictatorships. Nowhere in the calculations is a serious effort towards negotiations and a less militarised environment:
Confronted with evidence that chemical weapons have been used in Syria, President Obama now finds himself in a geopolitical box, his credibility at stake with frustratingly few good options.
The
origins of this dilemma can be traced in large part to a weekend last
August, when alarming intelligence reports suggested the besieged Syrian
government might be preparing to use chemical weapons. After months of
keeping a distance from the conflict, Mr. Obama felt he had to become
more directly engaged.
In a
frenetic series of meetings, the White House devised a 48-hour plan to
deter President Bashar al-Assad of Syria by using intermediaries like
Russia and Iran to send a message that one official summarized as, “Are
you crazy?” But when Mr. Obama emerged to issue the public version of
the warning, he went further than many aides realized he would.
This would be comical if the situation in Syria wasn’t so serious. This reporting, via the
New York Times,
shows the complete inability to understand that Washington isn’t the
arbiter of what happens inside Syria. Nor should it be. This is
ineptitude framed as serious policy. Besides, there are countless forces
backing the “rebels” and
they’re mostly dictatorships. Nowhere in the calculations is a serious effort towards negotiations and a less militarised environment:
Confronted with evidence that chemical weapons have been used in Syria, President Obama now finds himself in a geopolitical box, his credibility at stake with frustratingly few good options.
The
origins of this dilemma can be traced in large part to a weekend last
August, when alarming intelligence reports suggested the besieged Syrian
government might be preparing to use chemical weapons. After months of
keeping a distance from the conflict, Mr. Obama felt he had to become
more directly engaged.
In a
frenetic series of meetings, the White House devised a 48-hour plan to
deter President Bashar al-Assad of Syria by using intermediaries like
Russia and Iran to send a message that one official summarized as, “Are
you crazy?” But when Mr. Obama emerged to issue the public version of
the warning, he went further than many aides realized he would.
No comments:
Post a Comment