Wednesday, July 22, 2009

On Simon Wiesenthal: The head Nazi-hunter’s trail of lies

Times online

Simon Wiesenthal, famed for his pursuit of justice, caught fewer war criminals than he claimed and fabricated much of his own Holocaust story:

Since the early 1960s Simon Wiesenthal’s name has become synonymous with Nazi hunting. His standing is that of a secular saint. Nominated four times for the Nobel peace prize, the recipient of a British honorary knighthood, the US Presidential Medal of Freedom, the French Légion d’honneur and at least 53 other distinctions, he was often credited with some 1,100 Nazi “scalps”. He is remembered, above all, for his efforts to track down Adolf Eichmann, one of the most notorious war criminals.
-----------
The Angry Arab's comment:
"Not in the US press: the lies of Simon Wiesenthal
The lies of Simon Wisenthal: (but his staunch and unconditional support for Israeli wars and aggression, make his lies acceptable in the US press). Centers are named after him in the US. (thanks Shakib)"

23 comments:

  1. I read this yesterday and could not believe. I wonder how long this has been known and by whom?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I read this yesterday and could not believe it. I wonder how long this has been known and by whom?

    ReplyDelete
  3. "His figure is a complex and important one. If there was a motive for his duplicity, it may well have been rooted in good intentions. For his untruths are not the only shocking discoveries I have made researching the escape of Nazi war criminals. I found a lack of political will for hunting them. Many could have been brought to justice had governments allocated even comparatively meagre resources to their pursuit"

    ReplyDelete
  4. for a long time, by those who pushed the myth

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have never been of the mind to pounce upon and expose this

    ReplyDelete
  6. The angryarb has occasionally made sarcastic comments about him and I never understood why.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The angryarab has occasionally made sarcastic comments about him and I never understood why.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I know, I try to stay away from it - because reality of the Holocaust is so horrendous, I just cannot participate in the "sarcastic comments."

    There are things that you wish for so hard vza, because you are undone by your powerlessness, and sometimes this is "remedied" by myths of sorts. I barely got out of death camp tours without collapsing, and I just shy away from this issue.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes, I understand and I thnk you are quite right. I am surprised anyone who survived those camps was able to hold on to their sanity at all. I can't judge this poor man.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes, I understand and I think you are quite right. I am surprised anyone who survived those camps was able to hold on to their sanity at all. I can't judge this poor man.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Now on something off topic, but not unrelated -

    <h3 class="entry-header">Afghanistan mass grave coverup: update on evidence.</h3>

    "Following up on last week's post about our government's attempts to block investigation into mass killings in Afghanistan by a US-backed warlord (see this NYT article by James Risen):

    There is an update to the story today from Mark Benjamin at Salon, where you can also read through the archive of related FBI documents in PDF form.
    And Ben Greenberg writes in from Physicians for Human Rights, the organization that discovered the mass grave where the victims were buried. They've been investigating the case and advocating for appropriate action since 2001. Ben says:

    We've produced a 10 minute documentary video about the massacre and the three federal investigations that were impeded by the Bush Administration. It's called War Crimes and the White House: The Bush Administration's Cover-Up of the Dasht-e-Leili Massacre
    .
    The American Association for the Advancement of Science has also produced a report based on high resolution satellite imagery that shows evidence of when and how the mass grave site was subsequently dug up. A blog post on the satellite imagery report is here and the main images from the report are available here, along with a .kml file that can be used with Google Earth"

    ReplyDelete
  12. “At the White House, nobody said no to an investigation, but nobody ever said yes, either,” said Pierre Prosper, the former American ambassador for war crimes issues. “The first reaction of everybody there was, ‘Oh, this is a sensitive issue; this is a touchy issue politically.’ ”

    Hardly conclusive evidence the U.S. covered it up.
    I never could stomach warlord Dostum involved with the government but it was probably as a result of a deal to get support for Karzai. We were also in the middle of a war. Bush was probably afraid that if we put heat on Dostum he would use his considerable resources against us....which is a reasonable assessment. I wonder if the conditions are any better now for doing something about it. This guy is quite capable of turning around and supporting the Taliban. None of this is ever clean and simple. I can recall some of the despicable things we looked the other way about with regard to our "ally", the Soviet Union during and after World War II.

    ReplyDelete
  13. and the relevance this has for liberation of palestinians is ... ?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think we need a break, I do anyway...

    Here is the lighter side of ... well ...

    torture. :-E

    http://www.youtube.com/v/5v0d25QydCU&feature

    ReplyDelete
  15. What is the Aah! for. Jemmy Hope?

    ReplyDelete
  16. What is the Aah! for, Jemmy Hope?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Aah! "This poor man".
    Do you know the story of Wiesenthal, Kurt Waldheim, and the Israeli government?

    ReplyDelete
  18. In a nutshell -
    Wiesenthal was informed of Waldheim's dodgy war record - rounding  people up for transportaion to the death camps - before Waldheim became UN secretary general. He did nothing because the Israelis wanted Waldheim to get the post, someone they could blackmail with threats of exposure.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ugh. That's horrible. Well, so much for "poor man" Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Ugh. That's horrible. Well, so much for "poor man".  Thanks

    ReplyDelete