Look at this title in the Jerusalem Post :
'Iran will blow up the heart of Israel'
And here is what the bit of news is actually about:
"An aide to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vowed that if the Islamic republic is attacked by the US or by Israel, Teheran would "blow up the heart" of the Jewish state, Reuters cited a report by the official Iranian news agency on Friday.
According to the report, Mojtaba Zolnour threatened that "Even if one American or Zionist missile hits our country, before the dust settles, Iranian missiles will blow up the heart of Israel."
-----------------
Of course there was no need to put the condiotional "if attacked" because we all know Iran is going to wipe Israel off the map anyway, so why bother with honest reporting?
Friday, October 9, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How about Obama getting the Nobel Peace Prize just for not being George Bush?
ReplyDeleteNow he has to bomb Tehran just to prove to the flemingites he's made of the right stuff.
Shoot Jemmy, I already know Obama ain't made of the right stuff. Not only is he socialist, he has the balls of a modern day Nevelle Chamberlain.
ReplyDeleteIran, by itself, wont wipe anyone off the map. Not only because just trying would mean the end of the Iranian state. They dont have the werewithal. (although they seek it)
Regardless, Iran still openly seeks Israel's destruction, be it through subversive means and/or "international pressures". I mean duhhh, who doesnt get that?
Iranians love to talk tough. But they failed to defeat Saddam in 7 years of war. It then took the US about 6 weeks, coming from thousands of miles away. to be encampled in downtown Bagdhad and another few to find Saddam in his spider hole. Iran is an irritant to the US, nothing more. However, when they attain nuclear missile capabilities, they will pose an existential threat to Israel. Thus, even Obama must continue to take a hard line with the mullahs.
Can't these idiots find anything else to do, they even have the same old photo of a rocket taking off - gimme a break.
ReplyDeleteOh and by the way fleming, Mr. Neutral on Israel (self-proclaimed numerous other times), now proclaims the Zionist line, you are full of shit as usual. Mentally deficient indivduals like you should have automatic disclaimers on their posts.
Never said I was neutral V. I am not a zionist, in the sense of my opinions having a religious basis. But I do support states that are modern, successful and advance the human condition through development of new knowledge/technology.
ReplyDelete"... Obama ain't made of the right stuff."
ReplyDeleteI know, flem, he's only half white - but socialist, please! What has that man done that would make you imagine in your wildest dreams that he's a socialist?
As for Iran seeking Israel's destruction, I think they can safely leave that to the Israelis who are well on the way already.
I knew you'd "go there" Jemmy. You see almost everything in terms of race, dont you?
ReplyDeleteWhat has Obama done? Thankfully not much yet, but his words are pure socialism. "spread the wealth" / "healthcare for everyone" / "mortgage bailouts" / "bank bailouts" " new 'consumer protection agency" "union check card" etc etc etc
Shoot Jemmy, Im being nice calling him socialist. The man is closer to communist than anything Ive ever imagined in the white house.
FYI, I dont care for the russkies either, and they are...WHITE! Oh my god, somehow that is racist of me, though, right? LOL
Well than fleming, like I said you must be an Israeli supporter for other things than what you just said because Israel is trying to pull us back into the colonial 19th century. Any technology they advance is sorely hampered by their overall actions. This is like saying Israel is a modern advanced nation because some might get the Nobel Prize, it is a fallacous view. You must have really really admired Nazi Germany because of their technological advances, even though they killed millions of people throwing them back to the 18th century. There is no neutral technology either, but that is another story.
ReplyDeleteYeah well fleming all Obana is doing is just fancy footwork, it is the same type of dance the Roosevelt did to save capitalism from falling on its ass, and to try to keep the people from revolting. he is a capitalist through and through, look at where his campaign money came from - look at who the biggest check was cut for - and take a deep breath. Socialist my ass - oh, and "heaven forbid" that some should get more - that people should have health care (like the rest of the developed world) - that consumers should not be raped - I mean what is this world coming to?
ReplyDelete<span>Yeah well fleming all Obana is doing is just fancy footwork, it is the same type of dance that Roosevelt did to save capitalism from falling on its ass, and to try to keep the people from revolting, so little state capitalistic asses (because there has never been any other type) can be safe for posterity. He is a capitalist through and through, look at where his campaign money came from - look at who the biggest check was cut for - and take a deep breath. Socialist my ass - oh, and "heaven forbid" that some should get more - that people should have health care (like the rest of the developed world) - that consumers should not be raped - I mean what is this world coming to?</span>
ReplyDelete<span><span>Yeah well fleming all Obama is doing is just fancy footwork, it is the same type of dance that Roosevelt did to save capitalism from falling on its ass, and to try to keep the people from revolting, so little state capitalistic asses (because there has never been any other type) can be safe for posterity. He is a capitalist through and through, look at where his campaign money came from - look at who the biggest check was cut for - and take a deep breath. Socialist my ass - oh, and "heaven forbid" that some should get more - that people should have health care (like the rest of the developed world) - that consumers should not be raped - I mean what is this world coming to?</span></span>
ReplyDelete"Greed is good", SO 1980s.
ReplyDeleteIt is doubtful the Republicans would have agreed with any of the Nobel laureates.
ReplyDeletePerhaps they could consider devising their own prize and call it Deo Vindice 8-) ? ... or if not,...
Then maybe something along the lines of the Gog and Magog Prize for vanquishing the Un-Cleansed?
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-then-and-than.htm
ReplyDelete