"[Yesh Din ("there is a law/judgment"), an Israeli human rights organization established in 2005 to monitor abuses of Palestinians under Israeli occupation, has issued a report harshly critical of Israeli military trials of Palestinian suspects. These courts, which try thousands of Palestinian annually, have an astonishing 99.7% conviction rate, and trials routinely last for only a few minutes. Defendants, and even their lawyers, often do not understand the charges against them. Plea bargaining may account for some of the short duration of the trials, but even here, Yesh Din points out that pleas are usually lodged only after lengthy remands in prison before trial, during which defendants often have no access to their lawyers."
However, we must be talking about two different countries, a sort of bifurcation. I mean a model of justice like Army Abuse Case can't be the same country, can it? Actually it is a rather novel idea to have some ground rules that may sentence a soldier in a totally illegal occupation (which is probably just a showcase because it was caught on video) - where does the mighty Supreme Court of Israel stand on the occupation which is the overarching abuse where this other soldiers abuse happened?
Secondly, how is it that a soldier who abuses a civilian in a totally illegal occupation can get such protection that this judicial process runs his case all the way to the Supreme Court, when it might have been taken care of in any lower court? It must be two different countries or it must be something like this -
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style=" color: #404040; font-family: Verdana;">If the judge is your enemy who can you complain to?</span> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style=" color: #404040; font-family: Verdana;"> </span> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style=" color: #404040; font-family: Verdana;">Nasser Jabber heard from his neighbors that settlers had broken into his house and changed the locks at two in the morning on the 2nd of April. He was painting his house and left for a few days while taking a break. The settlers saw their window of opportunity. When Nasser arrived and saw the locks changed he called the police, as he would have been arrested if he tried to break back into his own home. When the police arrived and saw that settlers had indeed taken over the house they asked Nasser for documents to prove that he was the owner. Instead of removing the settlers that had stolen the Jabber home the police evacuated the Palestinians and treated the situation as if the settlers had every right to be there.</span> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style=" color: #404040; font-family: Verdana;"> </span> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style=" color: #404040; font-family: Verdana;">http://www.icahd.org/eng/news.asp?menu=5&submenu=1&item=695</span>
That sounds like the "wheels of justice" working there...perhaps they should take a shortcut to the Supreme Court, where "real" justice can be found...
We don't read franchise sites of "Little Green Footballs".
By the way, you can post until the <enter> key falls off your little lap top. It doesn't erase the truth:
"Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population." Moshe Dayan, address to the Technion, Haifa, reported in Haaretz, April 4, 1969.
"More than 70 people gathered outside the Peace Court today to support Ezra in his sentencing. Only a few of us managed to get in. At first, Ezra requested that everyone be permitted to enter and that the sentencing will take place in a larger hall, but his request was denied, and therefore the hearing did not start on time. As a result, the judge decided to postpone the sentencing to August 16, 8.30 AM. When told about the amount of letters sent on behalf of Ezra (more than 15,000 signatories through the Jewish Voice for Peace campaign — we brought a stack of 100 papers with a list of names), the judge said, “Wow, that much…” Ezra’s lawyer, Lea Tzemel, is convinced that the international campaign has a positive impact on the case. Please continue to spread the word, tell your friends and family to sign the letters in the campaign JVP is running (http://www.freeezra.org)"
es, I see how violent he was - throwing the soldiers around like rag dolls...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/01/israel-supreme-court-rule_n_224145.html
ReplyDelete<span style="font-family: Arial; line-height: 16px;">
<h1 style="list-style-type: none; list-style-position: initial; list-style-image: initial; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-bottom: 8px; padding: 0px; border: initial none initial;">Israel Supreme Court Rules Against Army In Palestinian Abuse Case</h1>
<div><span style=" font-weight: bold;">
</span></div>
<div style="float: right; list-style-type: none; list-style-position: initial; list-style-image: initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: initial none initial;"></div>
</span>
Oh, impressive :)
ReplyDelete"[Yesh Din ("there is a law/judgment"), an Israeli human rights organization established in 2005 to monitor abuses of Palestinians under Israeli occupation, has issued a report harshly critical of Israeli military trials of Palestinian suspects. These courts, which try thousands of Palestinian annually, have an astonishing 99.7% conviction rate, and trials routinely last for only a few minutes. Defendants, and even their lawyers, often do not understand the charges against them. Plea bargaining may account for some of the short duration of the trials, but even here, Yesh Din points out that pleas are usually lodged only after lengthy remands in prison before trial, during which defendants often have no access to their lawyers."
ISRAEL'S MOCKERY OF JUSTICE
http://notinhisname.blogdrive.com/archive/cm-01_cy-2008_m-1_d-09_y-2008_o-0.html
However, we must be talking about two different countries, a sort of bifurcation. I mean a model of justice like Army Abuse Case can't be the same country, can it? Actually it is a rather novel idea to have some ground rules that may sentence a soldier in a totally illegal occupation (which is probably just a showcase because it was caught on video) - where does the mighty Supreme Court of Israel stand on the occupation which is the overarching abuse where this other soldiers abuse happened?
Secondly, how is it that a soldier who abuses a civilian in a totally illegal occupation can get such protection that this judicial process runs his case all the way to the Supreme Court, when it might have been taken care of in any lower court? It must be two different countries or it must be something like this -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6Ps_MBXEdA
Here are the Nazis:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.factsofisrael.com/blog/archives/000556.html
http://www.factsofisrael.com/en/images/articles/palestinian-nazis.jpg
http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/pictures/PalestinianNaziSalute01.jpg
http://www.honestreporting.com/images/papoliceheil.jpg
http://rightwingerz.com/wp-content/FatahYouth.jpg
http://www.aijac.org.au/review/2001/images/arabic_mein_kampf.jpg
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/18.htm
http://bp1.blogger.com/_bG9aGH8yrpU/RsuvALeQWnI/AAAAAAAAANo/eSu8TGKFm7M/s1600/realholocaust.jpg
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index_files/BlessHitler.jpg
http://www.israellycool.com/2008/06/03/ny-israel-day-parade-photos-terror-supporters-inc/
http://www.nationalreview.com/goldberg/goldberg062102.asp
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/03/19/nmein19.xml&sSheet=/news/2002/03/19/ixhome.html
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheGreatAdolf
Nazis won't be tolerated here in OUR land- and if Ezra Nawi or others support them, they do so at their own risk.
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style=" color: #404040; font-family: Verdana;">If the judge is your enemy who can you complain to?</span>
ReplyDelete<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style=" color: #404040; font-family: Verdana;"> </span>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style=" color: #404040; font-family: Verdana;">Nasser Jabber heard from his neighbors that settlers had broken into his house and changed the locks at two in the morning on the 2nd of April. He was painting his house and left for a few days while taking a break. The settlers saw their window of opportunity. When Nasser arrived and saw the locks changed he called the police, as he would have been arrested if he tried to break back into his own home. When the police arrived and saw that settlers had indeed taken over the house they asked Nasser for documents to prove that he was the owner. Instead of removing the settlers that had stolen the Jabber home the police evacuated the Palestinians and treated the situation as if the settlers had every right to be there.</span>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style=" color: #404040; font-family: Verdana;"> </span>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style=" color: #404040; font-family: Verdana;">http://www.icahd.org/eng/news.asp?menu=5&submenu=1&item=695</span>
That sounds like the "wheels of justice" working there...
ReplyDeleteThat sounds like the "wheels of justice" working there...perhaps they should take a shortcut to the Supreme Court, where "real" justice can be found...
ReplyDeleteWe don't read franchise sites of "Little Green Footballs".
ReplyDeleteBy the way, you can post until the <enter> key falls off your little lap top. It doesn't erase the truth:
"Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population." Moshe Dayan, address to the Technion, Haifa, reported in Haaretz, April 4, 1969.
"More than 70 people gathered outside the Peace Court today to support Ezra in his sentencing.
ReplyDeleteOnly a few of us managed to get in. At first, Ezra requested that everyone be permitted to enter and
that the sentencing will take place in a larger hall, but his request was denied, and therefore the hearing
did not start on time. As a result, the judge decided to postpone the sentencing to August 16, 8.30 AM.
When told about the amount of letters sent on behalf of Ezra (more than 15,000 signatories through the
Jewish Voice for Peace campaign — we brought a stack of 100 papers with a list of names), the judge
said, “Wow, that much…”
Ezra’s lawyer, Lea Tzemel, is convinced that the international campaign has a positive impact on the
case. Please continue to spread the word, tell your friends and family to sign the letters in the campaign
JVP is running (http://www.freeezra.org)"
http://ibnezra.wordpress.com/
So, why won't the hallowed halls of justice sentence someone when others are watching?
ReplyDelete