I despise BHL (As he's deliciously referred to in France)!
Whatever BHL stands for I stand against! After all this is the guy who found during the onslaught on Gaza that the IDF treated the civilians with extreme care, warning them before any bombardment! The most moral and humane army in the world!!!
In 32 years living in France, I never ever met anyone who doesn't despise BHL! But then again I didn't mix with thugs all that often!!!
Judge for yourself!
The Swan Song of the Islamic Republic
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Secret Government(CIA Overthrow of Mossadeq)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaGCJmCAJ40&eurl=http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/06/18/cia-has-distributed-400-million-dollars-inside-iran-to-evoke-a-revolution/&feature=player_embedded
I don't remember if I posted this interview here yesterday or not:
ReplyDeleteAn Exclusive Interview With a pro-Ahmadinijed Cleric in Qom, Iran
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ali-a-rizvi/an-exclusive-interview-wi_b_219047.html
I am a huge fan of BHL. What do you disagree with him regarding, except for Palestine?
ReplyDeleteBHL wrote a book about Daniel Pearl, and has been a strong voice for supporting muslims everywhere in their struggle against the Takfiri and other extremists.
Myths And Lies – by Jaffer Ali
ReplyDeletehttp://quotes.gophercentral.com/
"Democracy has never… I REPEAT NEVER been a real principle
ReplyDeleteanimating our foreign policy."
That's for sure. Our guys at State and the DoJ have been covering for Saudi Arabia for years. Disgusting.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/world/middleeast/24saudi.html?_r=1
ReplyDeleteWASHINGTON — Documents gathered by lawyers for the families of Sept. 11 victims provide new evidence of extensive financial support for Al Qaeda and other extremist groups by members of the Saudi royal family, but the material may never find its way into court because of legal and diplomatic obstacles.
If you don't like him, why did you post him? Just curious.
ReplyDeleteGaza -Hasbara
ReplyDeletehttp://s216.photobucket.com/albums/cc105/seatonsnet/?action=view¤t=gaza-hasbara.flv
I am amazed at the immense hubris of this fellow, he must think that no one in the United States understands the types of regimes planted by the Euro/American junta. What an assumption of ignorance on the part of the American people -
ReplyDelete"Whatever happens, whatever the result of this crisis provoked two weeks ago by the enormity of a fraud that serious-minded people can no longer doubt, no Iranian leader can appear on the global scene, or in any negotiation with Obama, Sarkozy, or Merkel, without being haloed, not by the nimbus of light dreamed of by Ahmadinejad in his 2005 speech to the United Nations, but by the cloud of sulphur that crowns cheaters and butchers."
You mean like the ones the USA supportsd Bernard? Than they should feel quite at home discussing any subject whatsover with Iranian leadership...lol
This fellow also assumes an immensely simple scenario, as if there are two monolithic blocs fighting each other. And the "...timid Mousavi..."...LOL Also "...there is not a regime on earth that can remain in power against the people..."
Let me use this this fellows technique - "whatever happens, whatever happens, whatever happens...this should be the last time we see an article written like this in HP...LOL
I am amazed at the immense hubris of this fellow, he must think that no one in the United States understands the types of regimes planted by the Euro/American junta. What an assumption of ignorance on the part of the American people -
ReplyDelete"Whatever happens, whatever the result of this crisis provoked two weeks ago by the enormity of a fraud that serious-minded people can no longer doubt, no Iranian leader can appear on the global scene, or in any negotiation with Obama, Sarkozy, or Merkel, without being haloed, not by the nimbus of light dreamed of by Ahmadinejad in his 2005 speech to the United Nations, but by the cloud of sulphur that crowns cheaters and butchers."
You mean like the ones the USA supportsd Bernard? Than they should feel quite at home discussing any subject whatsover with Iranian leadership...lol
This fellow also assumes an immensely simple scenario, as if there are two monolithic blocs fighting each other. And the "...timid Mousavi..."...LOL Also "...there is not a regime on earth that can remain in power against the people..."
Let me use this this fellows technique - "whatever happens, whatever happens, whatever happens...this should be the last time we see an article written like this in HP, or anywhere else by this agenda apparent blowhard...LOL
Now, having said what I did above, it is high time for the old guard of the revolution to make way for a broader interpretation of what the revolution was meant to be initially, and where it must go. That is because it has become what it was never supposed to be, run by a cadre of individuals steeped in ideology that does not reflect the 70 percent plus individuals born after 1979.
ReplyDeleteThe sheer intolerance of the group is almost unbearable, having locked away what it promised in the beginning of the revolution but never delivered. The sheer play of the classes against one another, the impoverished south, and the exclusion of those who differ from this hard line is not only unacceptable, it is unbearable.
Someone is going to have to move toward the center, and present the embrace of the diversity in the population. It is not necessary to become some voracious capitalistic monster, which itself is teetering all over the world - hence the laughable nature of those with ill will toward Iran bloviating endlessly is nothing but a joke. Iran, all of Iran from every interest can be what it is meant to be, a revolution reflecting all of the people.
Now, having said what I did above, it is high time for the old guard of the revolution to make way for a broader interpretation of what the revolution was meant to be initially, and where it must go. That is because it has become what it was never supposed to be, run by a cadre of individuals steeped in ideology that does not reflect the 70 percent plus individuals born after 1979.
ReplyDeleteThe sheer intolerance of the group is almost unbearable, having locked away what it promised in the beginning of the revolution but never delivered - the religious pretense giving way to malformed corruption. The sheer play of the classes against one another, the impoverished south, and the exclusion of those who differ from this hard line is not only unacceptable, it is inexcusable.
Someone is going to have to move toward the center, and present the embrace of the diversity in the population. It is not necessary to become some voracious capitalistic monster, which itself is teetering all over the world - hence the laughable nature of those with ill will toward Iran bloviating endlessly is nothing but a joke. Iran, all of Iran from every interest can be what it is meant to be, a revolution reflecting all of the people.
Wow! An excellent comment, v.
ReplyDeleteI certainly don't disagree that the Iranian revolution is in need of some internal reforms, but they are not in need of reform when it comes to Iran's sovereignty or their support of resistance to foreign occupation, and outside hegenomy and interference in their region ...
ReplyDeleteThan we are in agreement Marion, as you noticed I did not say that anyone was supposed to "come to their rescue." If these countries putting out endless screeds are a joke (like the USA), that certainly does not mean that I invited anyone to "liberate" them, does it?
ReplyDeleteMarion, were the Quom Marjeya and a young Khamenei wrong to play a signficant role in helping the Shah defeat Mossedeq?
ReplyDeleteIf so, what do you think caused them to make that mistake? Do you think it was an over reaction to the Soviet occupation of Iran in the 1940s?
Do you think Mossadeq was a communist Soviet quisling? Or was Mossadeq a nationalist? How about the last Shah?
Come on now vza, it is more than "covering for" or "supporting" these regimes, it is creating and maintaining them. Big big difference.
ReplyDeleteAs an example of clarification Marion, I answered a little earlier to the use of technology inside of Iran -
ReplyDelete"Just because you have avenues of communication does not mean you exploit it ...., or try to turn it into some media circus by spotlighting it in order to destabilize the country. Now, while there is going to be concern for what is happening there, it does not mean you are going to try to drive what is going on there, or, to so interpret it so the situation inflames and the country is endangered."
So Marion I do not support either use of technology or more conventional means by other nations to interfere or exploit inside of Iran, I trust that is clear
anand,
ReplyDeleteWho or what exactly is your source of info. on the Qom Marjeyah, Imam Khameini, Mossadeq, the Shah anand because I have no idea what you are talking about...
Marion, I have given you many links in the past. Vali Nasr, Fareed Zakaria wrote about it. Many historians have.
ReplyDeleteAsk your older family members. Many top Shia clerics in 1953 publicly blasted Mossedeq and communism in general.
It looks to me like the international community is increasingly rallying behind Ahmenijad and Khamenei. Indonesia (the world's largest and most important muslim country . . . and a much respected free democracy) has done so: http://www.antaranews.com/en/view/?i=1245035060&c=NAT&s=
ReplyDeleteSo have President Karzai of Afghanistan, President Lula of Brazil (another large important free democracy), President Hu of China, Russia, Turkey (an important free democracy in the middle east.)
So far President Obama, Europe, India, Japan, Australia and a few other countries are holding out, but for how long?
Does anyone know where Thailand, South Korea and Mexico are on the Iranian elections?
Have Khamenei and Ahmenijad already won? So many countries wouldn't endorse Ahmenijad unless they were sure he and Khamenei would prevail.
Marion, now that President Karzai has proven his loyalty to Khamenei once again (being one of the first to endorse Ahmenijad outside Iran), his long time friend and ally, will you support President Karzai and the Afghan Government? Will you support the ANA (Afghan National Army) and ANP (Afghan National Police) that report to President Karzai? Do you support Iran doing more to help train and equip the ANA and ANP? Khamenei has offered to do so in the past.
Last I knew Afghanistan was still being occupied anand, so I will not support an occupied government. BUt why are you trying to portray my recognition of any government as being legitminate as being linked to its loyaty to Khameini...?
ReplyDeleteMarion, Khamenei and Nasrallah support President Karzai, the Afghan Government and the ANA and ANP which are loyal to President Karzai. But Marion does not? I am surprised? It seems like you back Nasrallah and think whatever he says is true. Am I wrong?
ReplyDeleteMarion, do you want the ANA and ANP to win, or do you want the Taliban and Takfiri to defeat them?
In the most recent Afghan public opinion poll that came out a few days ago, the vast majority of Afghans strongly opposed the Taliban. 67% also felt that having more foreign troops was important for Afghanistan. {My interpretation is that Afghans want more foreign funding, training and equiping for their ANA and ANP.} Most Afghans would probably welcome more Iranian trainers for the ANA and ANP. Khamenei himself has offered this in the past. Do you favor Iran doing more to help the ANA and ANP?
Anand, I want a Takfiri to shove a bomb up your ass
ReplyDeleteV, were you happy when OBL killed those Shia in Gilgit Pakistan in 1988? How about when OBL and the Taliban gutted those Shia in Mazar e Sharif in 1998? Did you weep with joy when Mumbai was attacked last year? Do you feel happy when the Takfiri mass murder tens of thousands of Pakistani civilians? How about the terrorist attacks against Russia and Thailand?
ReplyDeleteLet's just cut to the chase V. Do you support violent attacks against the ANA and ANP? Do you support violent attacks against the IA (Iraqi Army) and IP (Iraqi Police)?
I support any complete destruction of colonial enterprise and individuals
ReplyDeleteAre you now trying to insinuate that I support AlQaeda and the Taliban anand, because told you that I do not support the occupied government in Afghanistan? Is everything always black and white with you anand?
ReplyDeleteSome good advice:
ReplyDelete<p>Stay Out of Iran’s Evolutionary Process
<div class="details3">by Philip Giraldi, June 25, 2009</div>
<div class="details3">
</div>
<div class="details3">http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2009/06/24/stay-out-of-irans-evolutionary-process/
</div>
An interesting series of articles concerning the bombing of the Khobar towers in Saudi, which only three out of five have been published thus far at the antiwar.com site:
ReplyDeletePART 1:
http://original.antiwar.com/porter/2009/06/22/saudis-tried-to-pin-khobar-bombing-on-iran/
Part 2
http://original.antiwar.com/porter/2009/06/23/saudi-account-of-khobar/
Part 3
http://original.antiwar.com/porter/2009/06/24/us-officials-leaked-false-story-blaming-iran-for-khobar-attack/
"Marion, I have given you many links in the past."
ReplyDeleteNot true, and you still haven't provided any links to your claims other than a couple of names....
No one needs to insinuate anything about Anand...lol he is a complete horses ass, and i still support the destruction of all colonial enterprise - everywhere
ReplyDeleteThat includes ALL global dominance
ReplyDeleteAnswer the question.
ReplyDeleteWhat does "occupied government" mean. The Afghan (and Iraqi) government(s) are freely elected in UN monitored elections. Don't Afghans and Iraqis have the right to elect their own leaders?
ReplyDeleteMarion, I think you oppose the Takfiri, AQ and Taliban.
This is tiring. Maybe I'll provide you more links over the next few days. I have provided you many links many times.
ReplyDeleteYou are "occupied territory" Anand, you're a goner
ReplyDeleteRemember this is our moderate ally we are talking about here....LOL!!!!
ReplyDelete"Marion, I think you oppose the Takfiri, AQ and Taliban."--anand
ReplyDeleteAt least you have manged to get something about me right anand....
What have you done to get so tired over anand?
ReplyDeleteTakfiri is really a part of Anands posterior anatomy, it springs from his ignorant Muslim hatred. In the past he has told me that all problems in India spring from the Muslim community, in short, he is a little fascist pig. Anyone who does not bow to the current global dominance or feral economic system that merely enriches the few is a threat. Of course, there is another theory, that Takfiri for Anand is merely a dildo he uses,
ReplyDeleteDo you think that AQ linked networks or other Takfiris carried out Khobar rather than Hezbollah? I think it "MIGHT" have been the Takfiris.
ReplyDeleteMarion, I don't understand "occupied government."
Did America have an occupied government because it was under French occupation between 1778 and 1783? Do Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Turkey, Singapore, Australia and the UK have "occupied governments?" All of them are under US occupation.
After Katrina, the US was under Mexican occupation because Mexican occupation forces helped out with hurricane relief. Did that mean that the US had an "occupied government"?
Is an "occupied government" really code for any government that Marion dislikes?
KSA is America's enemy. But few American politicians have the courage to admit it out load. Saudi Arabia's lobby might be more powerful than the Israeli lobby.
ReplyDeleteYour "comparisons" are like apples and oranges, another sign how full of shit you are Anand. Running out of spurious illustrations, never fear Anand, you might try shutting up rather than removing all doubt about your ignorance with a post.
ReplyDeleteMarion, I responded to you on a more recent thread.
ReplyDelete