Thursday, September 23, 2010

Bill Clinton: Russian immigrants are obstacle to peace

Former United States president Bill Clinton came under fire from Russian-born Israeli politicians on Wednesday, a day after he told the media that the Russian immigrant population in Israel is an obstacle to peace with Palestinians.

"An increasing number of the young people in the IDF [Israel Occupation Forces] are the children of Russians and settlers, the hardest-core people against a division of the land. This presents a staggering problem," Clinton told a round table with press in New York. "It's a different Israel. Sixteen percent of Israelis speak Russian."

Read more

---------
Russian-born Israeli fascists are more so than the US-born ones? News to me..

11 comments:

  1. <span>"Russian-born Israeli fascists are more so than the US-born ones? News to me.."</span>
    <span>I was thinking the same. Maybe Clinton wanted to make a contribution to the discussion without alienating all those super-rich right-wing zionists in the US.</span>

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's pretty funny that Clinton said that-his administration gave billions to Israel over eight years. And that windfull has emboldened Israel to act slightly aggresive. Israel has been around for over sixty years, and during the whole time it has been disenfranchising the native population and encroaching on its neighbors' territory. The Russian immigrant thing came about more recently. There won't be peace in the Mideast until the root of the problem is addressed-that Zionism is a cruel and unfair system. Whether it is promoted by Russians, Americans, or Jewish Arabs is immaterial.

    ReplyDelete
  3. On a different subject...
    http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/23-4

    ReplyDelete
  4. hey, is v still around here?  can't find his site.

    ReplyDelete
  5. http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/15-shocking-poverty-statistics-that-are-skyrocketing-as-the-american-middle-class-continues-to-be-slowly-wiped-out

    ReplyDelete
  6. <pre>ADC Calls on Harvard University to Rescind Decision to Honor Peretz

    Washington, DC | www.adc.org | September 24, 2010 -- The American-Arab
    Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) is dismayed that Harvard University
    is proceeding with its decision to honor Martin Peretz by creating a
    research fund in his name despite his long public record of racism. In
    addition, Harvard has chosen to include Mr. Peretz as part of the
    program for its 50th anniversary celebration of the Social Studies
    Program, on Saturday, September 25th, bestowing an additional honor on
    Mr. Peretz for that occasion. ADC joins the many faculty, students,
    alumni, staff and other members of the Harvard Community that have
    opposed extending these honors to Mr. Peretz and have requested that
    these decisions be rescinded.

    ADC notes that in a previous instance, Harvard University reportedly
    undertook an investigation of allegations of bias against Shaykh Zayed
    al-Nahyan of the UAE when he made a substantial donation in 2003. That
    investigation resulted in the termination of the donation in question
    in 2004. At that time, the Harvard Crimson argued that "no
    donation is worth indebting the university to practitioners of hate and
    bigotry." ADC concurs with this view and calls on Harvard to
    remain consistent to its own prior record by declining donations
    connected to bigotry, including any donation creating a fund to be
    named for Mr. Peretz. Mr. Peretz's recent public comments that
    Muslim-Americans are not "worthy" of First Amendment rights
    and alleging that all Muslims are complicit in "the routine and
    random bloodshed that defines their brotherhood" are deeply
    offensive and not worthy of being honored. These comments are also
    consistent with Mr. Peretz's 25-year record of bigoted statements
    against minority communities in the United States, including
    African-Americans, Latinos, Arabs and Muslims. This record has been
    amply documented in recent media coverage and in the open letters
    addressed by concerned Harvard students and alumni to university
    officials. Mr. Peretz's recent effort at a public apology for his
    comments concerning free speech rights of Muslims only underscores his
    inability to rise above his own legacy of bigotry. After his original
    comments were exposed and denounced in the pages of the New York Times
    and elsewhere, he retracted his statement on the First Amendment while
    adding insult to injury by reiterating his view that "Muslim life
    is cheap." Indeed, he went on to affirm that his observation about
    the cheapness of Muslim life was "a statement of fact, not
    value."
    </pre>

    ReplyDelete
  7. ADC Calls on Harvard University to Rescind Decision to Honor Peretz  Washington, DC | www.adc.org | September 24, 2010 -- The American-Arab  Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) is dismayed that Harvard University  is proceeding with its decision to honor Martin Peretz by creating a  research fund in his name despite his long public record of racism. In  addition, Harvard has chosen to include Mr. Peretz as part of the  program for its 50th anniversary celebration of the Social Studies  Program, on Saturday, September 25th, bestowing an additional honor on  Mr. Peretz for that occasion. ADC joins the many faculty, students,  alumni, staff and other members of the Harvard Community that have  opposed extending these honors to Mr. Peretz and have requested that  these decisions be rescinded.  ADC notes that in a previous instance, Harvard University reportedly  undertook an investigation of allegations of bias against Shaykh Zayed  al-Nahyan of the UAE when he made a substantial donation in 2003. That  investigation resulted in the termination of the donation in question  in 2004. At that time, the Harvard Crimson argued that "no  donation is worth indebting the university to practitioners of hate and  bigotry." ADC concurs with this view and calls on Harvard to  remain consistent to its own prior record by declining donations  connected to bigotry, including any donation creating a fund to be  named for Mr. Peretz. Mr. Peretz's recent public comments that  Muslim-Americans are not "worthy" of First Amendment rights  and alleging that all Muslims are complicit in "the routine and  random bloodshed that defines their brotherhood" are deeply  offensive and not worthy of being honored. These comments are also  consistent with Mr. Peretz's 25-year record of bigoted statements  against minority communities in the United States, including  African-Americans, Latinos, Arabs and Muslims. This record has been  amply documented in recent media coverage and in the open letters  addressed by concerned Harvard students and alumni to university  officials. Mr. Peretz's recent effort at a public apology for his  comments concerning free speech rights of Muslims only underscores his  inability to rise above his own legacy of bigotry. After his original  comments were exposed and denounced in the pages of the New York Times  and elsewhere, he retracted his statement on the First Amendment while  adding insult to injury by reiterating his view that "Muslim life  is cheap." Indeed, he went on to affirm that his observation about  the cheapness of Muslim life was "a statement of fact, not  value."

    ReplyDelete
  8. continuation:
    ADC strongly affirms Mr. Peretz's First Amendment rights, including his  right to make bigoted or racist statements. However, neither principles  of free speech nor a commitment to academic freedom require a  university to bestow honors on an individual who, like Mr. Peretz, has  repeatedly made racist statements, deeply offensive to communities  worldwide and specifically offensive to members of the university  community itself.  ADC calls on Harvard University to rescind its  decisions both to honor Mr. Peretz as part of Saturday's anniversary  celebration and to create a research fund in his name.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What percent of Israelis speak American English?  With a Brooklyn accent?  Just sayin!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Seems like 90% of those interviewed on British TV.

    ReplyDelete