Top AIPAC officials visited prostitutes, regularly watched porn at work: claim Is US's most influential advocate for Israel about to implode? A former foreign policy chief for the largest Israeli lobby in the US is threatening to provide evidence members of the organization regularly trafficked in classified US government information.
Read more-rawstory
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bottom line: A bunch of sleaze-bags.
ReplyDelete<span>"Top AIPAC officials visited prostitutes"</span>
ReplyDeleteTG, I'm very disappointed with you my friend. Since when do you post common knowledge? Isn't this AIPAC's raison d'être?
this is Abu Zuhair by the way. I don't know where the "Guest" came from :(
ReplyDeleteBut I'm still disappointed....
ReplyDeleteYes we know they're spies but it's good to be reminded of the basics every now and then..
ReplyDelete<span></span><span>I don't know where the "Guest" came from</span>
ReplyDelete<span>Yeah, that happens everynow and then, I'm not sure why..It'll go away..
</span>
You mean visiting prostitutes? Well I didn't know that actually but nothing comes as a surprise from those folk..
ReplyDeleteOff topic. If you were an Muslim parent with a child in a class with a teacher who is on record as having said the following, what would you do?
ReplyDelete<span>"It is pertinent to note that many Muslims do not object to invasion and occupation as long as they are doing the invading and occupying. They do not object to a people losing their homeland if they are the ones stealing it."</span>
Muslim conquest into the Middle East was humane according to the norms of the day and it was somewhat a liberation for Christians and Jews who had been persecuted by Byzantium. That is why these communities welcomed and even helped Muslim armies.
ReplyDelete<span>Thomas Brown, historian at the University of Edinburgh, agrees: "Coptic- and Aramaic-speaking Monophysites in Egypt and Syria saw their Arab fellow Semites as deliverers from Greek tax-gatherers and orthodox persecutors" and the early Islamic Empire under Umayyads (661-750) was for them "a regime which resembled a benign protectorate rather than an empire."</span>
ReplyDelete<span><span>That is why in 649 a Nestorian bishop wrote, "These Arabs, to whom God has given in our time the dominion. . . fight not against the Christian religion; nay, rather they defend our faith, they revere our priests and saints, and they make gifts to our churches and monasteries." (Rev. Hanna Kildani PHD, Modern Christianity in the Holy Land)</span>
ReplyDelete<span> </span>
<span>In contrast, VZA presents us a history of Islam from which blood is dripping through every spot, by picking exclusively the many different bloody episodes in the history of Islamic civilization. The fair thing to do, however, is not to collect episodes of violence and neglect others, but to see the whole picture.</span></span>
I was making a joke about the nature of lobbying my friend :)
ReplyDelete<span><span><span>The fair thing to do, however, is not to collect episodes of violence and neglect others, but to see the whole picture.</span></span></span>
ReplyDeleteI agree wholeheartedly. Let us remember that when we discuss the history of the United States and Western civilization. That has been my point all along. Look at the whole picture.
<span>I don't deny any of that, r. s., but it was still conquest by invasion, occupation, and colonization. The record, (as for ALL empires and nations) is complex. Periods of great tolerance and depending on who was in power, periods of persecution. </span>
ReplyDelete