Saturday, December 12, 2009

Tony Blair admits: I would have invaded Iraq anyway

WMD were not vital for war says ex-PM ahead of appearance at Chilcot inquiry
He said he would have invaded Iraq even without evidence of weapons of mass destruction and would have found a way to justify the war to parliament and the public.
---------
The problem is that he didn't state such a thing before the invasion but maintained the WMD pretext. What does that say about this creep?
Posted by at

3 comments:

  1. Jemmy HopeDecember 12, 2009 at 6:20 AM

    At last, a partial truth from the liar extraordinaire. The whole truth would be an admission that he KNEW that there were no WMDs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Iraqi MojoDecember 12, 2009 at 9:33 AM

    They should have argued that overthrowing a criminal regime would be good for the Iraqi people.  That argument should have been made in 1991.  Wait, I remember daddy Bush making that argument, but then he ordered US troops to not enter Baghdad and prevent Shia rebels from taking over.  

    The US & UK have made huge mistakes in Iraq for decades, resulting in the deaths of millions of innocent Iraqis. Our Arab "brothers" did not help. 

    ReplyDelete
  3. bushtheliberatorDecember 12, 2009 at 8:25 PM

    All the Bush-Haters
    And their Lefty Friends
    Couldn't put Saddam's
    Neck together again ;
    Let's Roll,Tony !

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)