Monday, August 17, 2009

Anti-Muslim Blogosphere Runs Amuck: Forced to Eat Crow

The Loon world was whipped into a frenzy based on, as usual, the reinforcing winds of ignorance and hate. In what was meant to be an unremarkable story, Tim Marshall a reporter for Sky News blogged on a mass wedding celebration in the Gaza Strip officiated by Hamas. Marshall reports in his excellent blog Islamophobia. Ignorance or Propaganda?,

5 comments:

  1. VZA, you may want to check out some stuff on Robert Spencer at this site.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I read the debunking of this a couple of weeks ago on Marshall's blog.

    <span>"...you may want to check out some stuff on Robert Spencer at this site."</span>

    When Spencer is wrong, he is spectacularly wrong, but he is not always wrong. His motivations are his concern, not mine. I read all over the blogosphere. That does not mean I believe everything I read. One of the things I do is look for links that will back up any claim made in a post and I try to look for another perspective. For example, I often read MuslimMatters and Islam Online. What I will not do is adopt ANY group's or individual's party line about what is acceptable to read and what is not.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Objectivity demands accessing all sources, as long as one recognizes that specifically her, in the USA,  you have a multiplicity of poisoned sources masquerading as objective and caring (ESPECIALLY the supposed "authoritative" sources).  If you do not have real time experience, in this atmosphere and in the shadow of wars of choice and the concomitant "information" that accompanies such, than do not be surprised if people with that real time experience dismiss your "informed opinions."  A great portion of the "information" available here can be compared to the slave trade manuals available by the local Antebellum Slavery Society in the South.

    ReplyDelete
  4. <span>Objectivity demands accessing all sources, as long as one recognizes that specifically here, in the USA,  you have a multiplicity of poisoned sources masquerading as objective and caring (ESPECIALLY the supposed "authoritative" sources).  If you do not have real time experience to counterbalance, in this atmosphere and in the shadow of wars of choice and the concomitant "information" that accompanies such, than do not be surprised if people with that real time experience dismiss your "informed opinions."  A great portion of the "information" available here can be compared to slave trade manuals available through the local Antebellum Slavery Society in the South.</span>

    ReplyDelete
  5. <span><span>Objectivity demands accessing all sources, as long as one recognizes that specifically here, in the USA,  you have a multiplicity of poisoned sources masquerading as objective and caring (ESPECIALLY the supposed "authoritative" sources).  If you do not have real time experience to counterbalance, in this atmosphere and in the shadow of wars of choice and the concomitant "information" that accompanies such, than do not be surprised if people with that real time experience dismiss your "informed opinions."  A great portion of the "information" available here can be compared to slave trade manuals available through the local Antebellum Slavery Society in the South on the noble "Negro."
    </span></span>

    ReplyDelete