Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Omar Barghouti in Rome

Shmuel Sermoneta-Gertel
(Shmuel is a contributor to Mnodoweiss, occasionally as an author and regularly as a commentator. He's an Israeli anti-Zionist and lives in Italy.)
Last night I went to hear Omar Barghouti at an event titled “Palestine today. Nonviolent resistance to the Israeli occupation: academic and cultural boycott,” organised by the Roman network for solidarity with the Palestinian people. There were about 80 people there, and the event included the presentation of the book (in Italian) “Planning oppression: The complicity of Israeli academia.”

Barghouti blew me away. He is one of the most articulate, clear-thinking speakers I have ever heard. He presented the goals, importance and strategy of BDS in general, and academic and cultural boycott in particular, and addressed the reasons why Europeans should care about Palestine specifically (direct complicity in Israeli Apartheid), beyond the principle of basic human solidarity. Italy, as it happens, is Israel's second largest research partner, after the US.

Barghouti also discussed some of the main objections to BDS, such as the counterproductivity of boycotting all Israelis. He explained that the boycott is institutional and not individual – not because individuals bear no responsibility for Israeli apartheid, but because the McCarthyist scrutiny of individual Israelis, to separate the “good” from the “bad” is morally repugnant. When asked about those who wish to limit their boycott to the settlements, he replied that such a position is morally, legally and practically untenable. Even if one wishes to ignore the rights of Palestinians in Israel and those of Palestinian refugees, and focus only on the '67 occupation, it is the Israeli government and Israeli society as a whole that is responsible for those actions, not the settlers. Those who oppose the Chinese occupation of Tibet do not limit their actions to Chinese products made in Tibet, but boycott the Chinese government responsible for that occupation. On a practical level, Israel uses every trick in the book (including repackaging in Israel) to ensure that settlement products are virtually indistinguishable from non-settlement products.

Regarding the accusation of anti-Semitism frequently levelled at BDS, he replied that such an accusation is in itself anti-Semitic, inasmuch as it creates an equivalence between all Jews and Israeli policies, implying that Jews are monolothic and that all Jews should be held responsable for Israel's actions. Such generalisations and the idea of collective Jewish responsibility are fundamentally anti-Semitic. He called upon Europeans to stop assuaging their Holocaust guilt by oppressing the victims of the victims of the Holocaust.

6 comments:

  1. thankgodimatheistMay 12, 2010 at 9:02 PM

    <span>An interesting comment Shmuel wrote on his article. It deals with the notion that Palestinians and Israeli should "hug" each other (as we hear very often a certain inane commentator here suggests every now and then.."Marriage" he says!!):</span>
    <span>
    In his talk, Omar Barghouti told a story. Last year, he spoke at an event in The Hague, marking the 61st anniversary of the Nakba . A Dutch politician criticised him and BDS, suggesting that what Israelis and Palestinians really needed to was to hug each other. Barghouti replied: “When a master hugs a slave, it is not love, but rape. First the master-slave relationship must be ended, then we will be able to tolerate one another and eventually, who knows, maybe even come to love one another.” Barghouti added that “peace” is an oppressor’s concept, entirely to the oppressor’s advantage. Palestinians don’t need “peace” and don’t understand “peace”. What Palestinians need and understand is “just peace”. To non-Palestinians sympathetic to the Palestinian cause he said: “We don’t want your charity. We want your solidarity.” </span>

    ReplyDelete
  2. The only solutions are either marraige [hug each other] or divorce [two state solution.] There are no other solutions.

    Omar is wrong to think that Israel is a master of Palestine; or that Palestine is a master of Israel. Both are human beings . . . the question of slave and master do not apply.

    Gandhiji followed a "hug each other" model with respect to England. MLK followed a "hug each other" model in America; and Mandella followed a "hug each other" model in South Africa.

    If Palestinians recieve Israeli citizenship and equal rights, and the right to immigrate back to Israel, and market compensation for all private property confiscated for below market prices; then there is no master-slave relationship.

    Peace is not an "oppressor" concept. Palestinians want "peace" because they understand "peace" and know it benefits them economically, and in other ways.

    I don't think Palestinians want charity either. This is why economic development in Palestine is so important. Currently, the Palestinian Authority collects twice as much in international economic grants as it collects in tax revenue. This forces Palestinians to accede to the wishes of international donors.

    ReplyDelete


  3. <span><peace>></peace></span>

    When it comes to what the Palestinians want, you know better than Barghouti, I imagine.
    *Sigh*

    ReplyDelete
  4. <span>anan 
    While I get you here can you please tell me how people in real life react to your insanities?   Just curious..</span>

    ReplyDelete
  5. To imply that Palestinians don't want peace is in my view Likud/Lieberman anti Palestinian propoganda.

    Don't Palestinians want a just peace that benefits all parties and the world as a whole? Aren't Palestinians by nature full of heart, compassion and altruism?

    If the Palestinians get Israeli citizenship and civil rights; all Israelis and Palestinians will be one people, one culture, one nation. Equal members of one nation without masters or slaves.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If a one state solution isn't hugging each other, then what is it?

    <span><span>Omar Barghouti must not favor a one state solution from his comments. If so, what does he favor?</span></span>

    A two state solution based on 1967 borders with exchanges of equal quality?


    A two state solution based on 1948 UN partition plan with exchanges of equal quality?

    However, even in a two state solution; Israel will retain a very large number of Palestinian Israelis. Similarly, Palestine will probably retain many Israeli citizen residents, investors and business partners. Israel and Palestine are linked at the hip.

    In my view, having a large number of dual citizens would help Israel and Palestine achieve a two state solution.

    ReplyDelete