Anger is a legitimate emotion in the face of injustice. Passive acceptance of evil is not a virtue.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Just in case you're missing on fleming's latest racist and supremacist rants you need to check the post 'Juan Cole'..What's new now is that it's Arayns like him versus the rest of the world, us, Brownies!! Ha ha.. Another pint for the road fleming?
Be sure to read anan's posts. He initially claims Pakistainis as "arayan" and was puzzled why I didnt "get this".
He also has said on here, many times, how "unimportant" and inconsequential the "white man" is in today's evolving world. So yea, I will stick up for my race. No different than any of you sticking up for arabs or muslims or other "minoriities".
Look, I dont go around espousing arayan supremacy. But I know utter bs when I see it, and so I called anan on it. If that is racism then so be it.
Stupid ass I don't stick to Arabs or Muslims, you dumb shit. I defend a cause not a race..It was about time for you to come clear and you did, I give as much..But enough bullshit now! You're more like a fascist barfly than anything else!
<span>Stupid ass I don't "stick up" to Arabs or Muslims, you dumb shit. I defend a cause not a race..It was about time for you to come clear and you did, I give as much..But enough bullshit now! You're more like a fascist barfly than anything else!</span>
You are so blinded by rage and powerlessness you dont even see the real truth. So sad. The "cause" is lost, your people are doomed. Your personal appeal is zero, your ability to bring over new converts, nil. Good luck in loserville! LOL
<span>Not only you blew your cover , you blew your top as well. You more often than not sound like a drunkard.. We should have known better considering all the references to bars and pints. </span>
Oooooh, tgia perched as usual on the moral high ground....or so he believes...hahhaha
yea, sorry, I do imbibe on occassion. I know you folks view that dimly, as well as "western corruptuion of moral values".
You are showing your backward side - not too different than the screeching mullahs of iran. I see now more clearly why the difference between us is soooo wide. :)
<span>I know you folks view that dimly, as well as "western corruptuion of moral values". </span> ---------- HUH???! Where did you see that? You must be drunk now..No other explanation..
Its 9:41 am; Havent had an adult beverage since last Friday. I rarely drink much anymore, and really only on some social occassions. Sorry, Im sober....as a church...lol
Nah, none of my many faults are to be blamed on alcohol. Hate to disappoint. My views here are strictly the result of clear headed thinking.
'Aryan' doesn't enter the equation. I believe the term was used to identify peoples speaking Indo-European languages. Those so-called Aryan invaders of India were a mixture of Turkic and Iranic ethnicities. Anyway, Onan my self-confessed 'stupid' chela, many South Asian Muslim snobs (and racists) claim descent from Mughals or Arabs. TG, why don't you and and fellow bloggers agree a policy of zero tolerance of bigotry in its various forms, and, as moderator, you can delete any posts that offend without banning the offenders. Fleming would soon get tired if you turned him into a toothless attack dog. I know this policy could backfire on me as I pursue the Yankee Doodle Gandhi in search of a retraction and apology, but I'll just have to abuse him on other blogs if that's the case. Personally I'd say insulting individuals is OK to a certain extent, but insulting whole groups en bloc is out of order.
If there was a zero tolerance for bigotry, then there would be grounds to ban just about everyone who posts here. Your Yankee Doodle Ghandi remark might get you banned on a blog that didn't like your view points. I make occasional cracks that are not politically correct, so I am not saying I am any better than anyone else here.
Personally, I prefer that people are frank about how they feel rather than be sneaky or all intellectual about it. It is totally up to tgia etc. how much effort they want to put into controlling the content of the comments section. I would say, however, to just let people write what's on their minds and not worry about it.
I know it would be difficult to enforce, but I wouldn't mind any of my postings being deleted for offensive language as long as I got a personal message telling me what the objection was. If I had anything important to communicate I'd try to rewrite in an acceptable manner. If 'Yankee Doodle Gandhi' was deemed to be offensive I wouldn't be surprised. It's meant to be. I'm trying to provoke the individual so labelled. He constantly makes attacks on the British people and Europeans in his posts. That's because, imbecile that he is, he blames a whole nation for the crimes of its ruling class. So I don't object to him demonstrating his imbecility. Carry on, Dumbo, I say. For my information, Joe, do you have a cut-off point in your tolerance? Is there anything someone might post that would cause you to think, "That's going too far, reprehensible", etc.? I don't need you to furnish any example, just to know if you think that point could be reached.
<span>For my information, Joe, do you have a cut-off point in your tolerance?</span>
Yes, and it is actually pretty low. When I see this type of comment, I either write a sharp reply or scroll by it if I don't have the time. But I haven't seen anything posted here that was so horrible that I was harmed by reading it. And I have been hanging out here since the original Angry Arab site with people like bARABie, Controlled by Hatred, and Janice. There was even some guy who was urging Sunnis to rise up against someone-I forget who, and he did it in the most obscene way.
I think if people are going to be banned, the only honest way would be to have one rule: The bloggers can ban anyone they don't like. That's really the rule; we may as well be honest about it, rather than try to make rules based on the latest offensive comment all the time.
Be sure to read anan's posts. He initially claims Pakistainis as "arayan" and was puzzled why I didnt "get this".
ReplyDeleteHe also has said on here, many times, how "unimportant" and inconsequential the "white man" is in today's evolving world. So yea, I will stick up for my race. No different than any of you sticking up for arabs or muslims or other "minoriities".
Look, I dont go around espousing arayan supremacy. But I know utter bs when I see it, and so I called anan on it. If that is racism then so be it.
Stupid ass I don't stick to Arabs or Muslims, you dumb shit. I defend a cause not a race..It was about time for you to come clear and you did, I give as much..But enough bullshit now! You're more like a fascist barfly than anything else!
ReplyDelete<span>Stupid ass I don't "stick up" to Arabs or Muslims, you dumb shit. I defend a cause not a race..It was about time for you to come clear and you did, I give as much..But enough bullshit now! You're more like a fascist barfly than anything else!</span>
ReplyDeleteYou are so blinded by rage and powerlessness you dont even see the real truth. So sad. The "cause" is lost, your people are doomed. Your personal appeal is zero, your ability to bring over new converts, nil. Good luck in loserville! LOL
ReplyDelete<span>Not only you blew your cover , you blew your top as well. You more often than not sound like a drunkard.. We should have known better considering all the references to bars and pints.
ReplyDelete</span>
You see what gives you away is that while we see you as a citizen of country, the USA, you see us as a race!
ReplyDelete<span>your ability to bring over new converts,</span>
ReplyDelete-----------
in case you haven't noticed dumbass, I'm not a religious person..
Oooooh, tgia perched as usual on the moral high ground....or so he believes...hahhaha
ReplyDeleteyea, sorry, I do imbibe on occassion. I know you folks view that dimly, as well as "western corruptuion of moral values".
You are showing your backward side - not too different than the screeching mullahs of iran. I see now more clearly why the difference between us is soooo wide. :)
As Sweden 75 was brought to confess he snorts coke you will be brought to confess that you have an alcohol problem.
ReplyDelete<span>I know you folks view that dimly, as well as "western corruptuion of moral values". </span>
ReplyDelete----------
HUH???! Where did you see that?
You must be drunk now..No other explanation..
Its 9:41 am; Havent had an adult beverage since last Friday. I rarely drink much anymore, and really only on some social occassions. Sorry, Im sober....as a church...lol
ReplyDeleteNah, none of my many faults are to be blamed on alcohol. Hate to disappoint. My views here are strictly the result of clear headed thinking.
'Aryan' doesn't enter the equation. I believe the term was used to identify peoples speaking Indo-European languages. Those so-called Aryan invaders of India were a mixture of Turkic and Iranic ethnicities. Anyway, Onan my self-confessed 'stupid' chela, many South Asian Muslim snobs (and racists) claim descent from Mughals or Arabs.
ReplyDeleteTG, why don't you and and fellow bloggers agree a policy of zero tolerance of bigotry in its various forms, and, as moderator, you can delete any posts that offend without banning the offenders. Fleming would soon get tired if you turned him into a toothless attack dog.
I know this policy could backfire on me as I pursue the Yankee Doodle Gandhi in search of a retraction and apology, but I'll just have to abuse him on other blogs if that's the case. Personally I'd say insulting individuals is OK to a certain extent, but insulting whole groups en bloc is out of order.
Jemmy:
ReplyDeleteIf there was a zero tolerance for bigotry, then there would be grounds to ban just about everyone who posts here. Your Yankee Doodle Ghandi remark might get you banned on a blog that didn't like your view points. I make occasional cracks that are not politically correct, so I am not saying I am any better than anyone else here.
Personally, I prefer that people are frank about how they feel rather than be sneaky or all intellectual about it. It is totally up to tgia etc. how much effort they want to put into controlling the content of the comments section. I would say, however, to just let people write what's on their minds and not worry about it.
I know it would be difficult to enforce, but I wouldn't mind any of my postings being deleted for offensive language as long as I got a personal message telling me what the objection was. If I had anything important to communicate I'd try to rewrite in an acceptable manner.
ReplyDeleteIf 'Yankee Doodle Gandhi' was deemed to be offensive I wouldn't be surprised. It's meant to be. I'm trying to provoke the individual so labelled. He constantly makes attacks on the British people and Europeans in his posts. That's because, imbecile that he is, he blames a whole nation for the crimes of its ruling class. So I don't object to him demonstrating his imbecility. Carry on, Dumbo, I say.
For my information, Joe, do you have a cut-off point in your tolerance? Is there anything someone might post that would cause you to think, "That's going too far, reprehensible", etc.? I don't need you to furnish any example, just to know if you think that point could be reached.
Yankee Doodle Ghandi.... :) :) :)
ReplyDelete<span>For my information, Joe, do you have a cut-off point in your tolerance?</span>
ReplyDeleteYes, and it is actually pretty low. When I see this type of comment, I either write a sharp reply or scroll by it if I don't have the time. But I haven't seen anything posted here that was so horrible that I was harmed by reading it. And I have been hanging out here since the original Angry Arab site with people like bARABie, Controlled by Hatred, and Janice. There was even some guy who was urging Sunnis to rise up against someone-I forget who, and he did it in the most obscene way.
I think if people are going to be banned, the only honest way would be to have one rule: The bloggers can ban anyone they don't like. That's really the rule; we may as well be honest about it, rather than try to make rules based on the latest offensive comment all the time.