Visually interesting, but there is something a bit weird about the preoccupation with the pagan symbols, rituals, and of course the ubiquitous mention of freemasons. (Is there a conspiracy theory lurking there??) The creator of this video seems to disapprove of our buildings in Washington D.C. having so many architectural allusions to pagan gods and goddesses, the Roman Empire, etc and none to Jesus Christ or God. Very interesting.... a sure sign of a nut! Of course, when I see the phrase 'A New World Order" used like this, an immediate red flag goes up. I noticed the injection of the comparison to Palestine. I am surprised the Illuminati and the Protocols of the Elders did not make an appearance here, too.
<span>Visually interesting, but there is something a bit weird about the preoccupation with the pagan symbols, rituals, and of course the mention of freemasons. (Is there a conspiracy theory lurking there??) The creator of this video seems to disapprove of our buildings in Washington D.C. having so many architectural allusions to pagan gods and goddesses, the Roman Empire, etc and none to Jesus Christ or God. Very interesting.... a sure sign of a nut! Of course, when I see the phrase 'A New World Order" used like this, a red flag immediately goes up. I noticed the comparison to Palestine, too. Why not the Armenians or Assyrians?</span> <span> I am surprised the Illuminati and the Protocols of the Elders did not make an appearance here, too.</span>
<span><span>Visually interesting, but there is something a bit weird about the preoccupation with the pagan symbols, rituals, and of course the mention of freemasons. (Is there a conspiracy theory lurking there??) The creator of this video seems to disapprove of our buildings in Washington D.C. having so many architectural allusions to pagan gods and goddesses, the Roman Empire, etc and none to Christ or God. Very interesting.... a sure sign of a nut! Of course, when I see the phrase 'A New World Order" used like this, a red flag immediately goes up. I noticed the comparison to Palestine, too. Why not the Armenians or Assyrians?</span> <span> I am surprised the Illuminati and the Protocols of the Elders did not make an appearance here, too.</span></span>
Is there anyone of any sense who denies the genocide of the Native Americans? That is not the point, v. I am critiquing the video. There are more than a few indications this person just might be trying to pitch a few conspiracy theories near and dear to various nutjobs. The mention of occult rituals? Freemasonry? Paganism? Skull & Bones? Please.
They had to go to make way for fleming's "real Americans".
'Since the Indians did not have the concept of property or property rights--they didn't have a settled society, they had predominantly nomadic tribal "cultures"--they didn't have rights to the land, and there was no reason for anyone to grant them rights that they had not conceived of and were not using. It's wrong to attack a country that respects (or even tries to respect) individual rights.'
(Ayn Rand, real American) meaning, they just weren't greedy or selfish enough.
Change of topic - whose soundtrack? It sounds like a cross between Mogwai and Gotan Project. I suppose that stuff has a label, but I don't know what they call it.
Well flemings arguments are obviously spurious Jemmy, and that is because even the US government looked at them as viable nations and signed treaties with them. So it would be a different recorded matter if this were not the case (although it still does not do away with their rights, recognition of such not withstanding), but the US government worked with them just like treaties are agreed to by higher contracting nations.
However, the US government, just like it has done with many international treaties totally dishonored them, and to this day what was promised has never come to fruition. So greed is definitely a factor like you say Jemmy, but so is dishonesty and total disregard for binding legal documents, and what is now the worthless words inked on paper.
Visually interesting, but there is something a bit weird about the preoccupation with the pagan symbols, rituals, and of course the ubiquitous mention of freemasons. (Is there a conspiracy theory lurking there??) The creator of this video seems to disapprove of our buildings in Washington D.C. having so many architectural allusions to pagan gods and goddesses, the Roman Empire, etc and none to Jesus Christ or God. Very interesting.... a sure sign of a nut!
ReplyDeleteOf course, when I see the phrase 'A New World Order" used like this, an immediate red flag goes up. I noticed the injection of the comparison to Palestine. I am surprised the Illuminati and the Protocols of the Elders did not make an appearance here, too.
<span>Visually interesting, but there is something a bit weird about the preoccupation with the pagan symbols, rituals, and of course the mention of freemasons. (Is there a conspiracy theory lurking there??) The creator of this video seems to disapprove of our buildings in Washington D.C. having so many architectural allusions to pagan gods and goddesses, the Roman Empire, etc and none to Jesus Christ or God. Very interesting.... a sure sign of a nut!
ReplyDeleteOf course, when I see the phrase 'A New World Order" used like this, a red flag immediately goes up. I noticed the comparison to Palestine, too. Why not the Armenians or Assyrians?</span>
<span> I am surprised the Illuminati and the Protocols of the Elders did not make an appearance here, too.</span>
<span><span>Visually interesting, but there is something a bit weird about the preoccupation with the pagan symbols, rituals, and of course the mention of freemasons. (Is there a conspiracy theory lurking there??) The creator of this video seems to disapprove of our buildings in Washington D.C. having so many architectural allusions to pagan gods and goddesses, the Roman Empire, etc and none to Christ or God. Very interesting.... a sure sign of a nut!
ReplyDeleteOf course, when I see the phrase 'A New World Order" used like this, a red flag immediately goes up. I noticed the comparison to Palestine, too. Why not the Armenians or Assyrians?</span>
<span> I am surprised the Illuminati and the Protocols of the Elders did not make an appearance here, too.</span></span>
It still does not erase the "facts" of the genocide vza, too bad so sad
ReplyDeleteIs there anyone of any sense who denies the genocide of the Native Americans? That is not the point, v. I am critiquing the video. There are more than a few indications this person just might be trying to pitch a few conspiracy theories near and dear to various nutjobs. The mention of occult rituals? Freemasonry? Paganism? Skull & Bones? Please.
ReplyDeletehehehe
ReplyDeleteThey had to go to make way for fleming's "real Americans".
ReplyDelete'Since the Indians did not have the concept of property or property rights--they didn't have a settled society, they had predominantly nomadic tribal "cultures"--they didn't have rights to the land, and there was no reason for anyone to grant them rights that they had not conceived of and were not using. It's wrong to attack a country that respects (or even tries to respect) individual rights.'
(Ayn Rand, real American) meaning, they just weren't greedy or selfish enough.
Change of topic - whose soundtrack? It sounds like a cross between Mogwai and Gotan Project. I suppose that stuff has a label, but I don't know what they call it.
Well flemings arguments are obviously spurious Jemmy, and that is because even the US government looked at them as viable nations and signed treaties with them. So it would be a different recorded matter if this were not the case (although it still does not do away with their rights, recognition of such not withstanding), but the US government worked with them just like treaties are agreed to by higher contracting nations.
ReplyDeleteHowever, the US government, just like it has done with many international treaties totally dishonored them, and to this day what was promised has never come to fruition. So greed is definitely a factor like you say Jemmy, but so is dishonesty and total disregard for binding legal documents, and what is now the worthless words inked on paper.