Sunday, May 25, 2014
Analysis: Europe should atone for its sins
By John V. Whitbeck
Now that the American-monopolized "peace process" has expired, Europe should seize the initiative and try to do something useful for Israelis, Palestinians and peace.
If European states still believe that a decent "two-state solution" is conceivable, several useful initiatives are immediately available. They could support and reinforce the current two-state legality by joining the 134 states which have already extended diplomatic recognition to the State of Palestine. They could also require Israelis seeking visas to visit their countries to produce documentary evidence that they are not resident in occupied Palestine.
Read more
Settlers destroy farmers' crops in night attack in South Hebron
BETHLEHEM (Ma'an) -- Palestinian farmers in the South Hebron Hills awoke on Thursday to find wheat they had recently harvested lit on fire, in what they suspect may have been an attack by extremist Jewish settlers from a nearby outpost, a local peace group reported.
Farmers in the village of Qawawis reached their fields around 4:30 a.m. on Thursday morning to discover three tons of wheat burning on their property, close to the Israeli-only road 316 and the settler outpost of Mitzpe Yair, near Susiya, Operation Dove said in a statement.
Read more
Israeli forces deny Nablus farmers access to fields to harvest wheat
NABLUS (Ma'an) -- Israeli forces on Saturday morning prevented Palestinian farmers from accessing their fields to harvest wheat south of Nablus in the northern West Bank, a Palestinian official said.
Read more
Friday, May 2, 2014
Truth Addict: The Connection That Wasn't Made: Sterling, Kerry and Israeli Apartheid
“Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the Donald Sterling scandal is . . .” began the New York Times’ piece by their editorial board on the Donald Sterling controversy in which the Los Angeles Clippers owner was recorded making racist comments.
But what the Editorial Board of “the paper of record”
finds “most disturbing” differs from what this particular writer finds most
disturbing.
For the NYT editors the “most disturbing aspect” is that
no one in the NBA was surprised at Sterling’s comments. They had known about
Sterling’s racism for a long time. And this is why the NYT wants to know: “Why
Did the N.B.A. Long Tolerate Sterling?”
True and fair enough.
But, as usual, it is what is missing from the NYT piece
that is more revealing than what is offered. While denouncing the tolerance of
racism there is no mention of Israeli apartheid, which Sterling pointed to in
defense of his racist opinions.
Donald Sterling: It's the world! You go to Israel, the blacks are just treated like dogs.
V. Stiviano: So do you have to treat them like that too?
DS: The white Jews, there's white Jews and black Jews, do you understand?
V: And are the black Jews less than the white Jews?
DS: A hundred percent, fifty, a hundred percent.
V: And is that right?
DS: It isn't a question—we don't evaluate what's right and wrong, we live in a society. We live in a culture. We have to live within that culture.
V: But shouldn't we take a stand for what's wrong? And be the change and the difference?
DS: I don't want to change the culture, because I can't. It's too big and too [unknown].
V: But you can change yourself.
DS: I don't want to change…And while the racist policies of Israel is hardly limited to black Jews, at nearly the same time that Sterling made this comment another related item was in the news.
US Secretary of State John Kerry warned that if Israel did not
make progress in a Middle East peace agreement then they would risk becoming an
“apartheid state.” Of course, Palestinians, Arabs, and black Jews scoff
at the notion of “becoming” an apartheid state. But no matter, the comment
received immediate repudiation from influential Jewish groups that had
Secretary Kerry apologizing for his remark, as the NYT covered in their article
“Kerry
Expresses Regret After Apartheid Remark.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)