Woody Allen is very clearly in favor of the proposed Islamic cultural center near Ground Zero. At the premiere of his new film "You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger" this week, Allen shared his feelings on the Cordoba House with "Inside Edition." "I'm for the building of the mosque," Allen said. "I think that all the people weighing in on it except for the people that lost someone at Ground Zero...are exploitative, fake frauds using it for personal reasons and political reasons."
Read more
Woody Allen's was quick and easy..A lovely face..
ReplyDeleteMatching his lovely sentiments.
ReplyDeleteLovely indeed!
ReplyDeleteWow, Tgia!
ReplyDeleteHey turd breath (aka tgia) draw this!! LOL
ReplyDeleteThe Hollywood elite, like they have a clue. Damn, youre one dumb monkey
Wouldn't need much ink, TG.
ReplyDeleteI found a junble of non sequitors entitled I am a Zionist: at this url:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3664422,00.html
The relevant quote about Woody Allen:
<span><span>I am a Zionist.
I am a man of tomorrow but I also live my past. My dynasty includes Moses, Jesus, Maimonides, Sigmund Freud, Karl Marx, Albert Einstein, Woody Allen, Bobby Fischer, Bob Dylan, Franz Kafka, Herzl, and Ben-Gurion. I am part of a tiny persecuted minority that influenced the world more than any other nation. While others invested their energies in war, we had the sense to invest in our minds.
Besides including Woody Allen in this list, there are a few other rather ironic selections of individuals that justify Zionism-ironic because they are anti-Zionists or very critical of Zionism. In the next list, they'll probably include Norman Finklestein because his concern for Palestinians show how compasionate Jews are-so compasionate that they should be allowed to shoot a few more Arabs.
</span></span>
Apart from Jesus (Don't Jews love him!) none of those listed was born in the land now called Israel. Most of those belonging to the modern era wouldn't have wanted anything to do with the ersatz nation.
ReplyDelete<span>Apart from Jesus (Don't Jews love him!) none of those listed was born in the land now called Israel. Most of those belonging to the modern era wouldn't have wanted anything to do with the ersatz nation.</span>
ReplyDelete<span>Lots of creative artists and progressive thinkers in the diaspora. Among Israelis,who? Amos Oz and Dana International.</span>
I find your comment more insulting to you than it is to me, fleming..I'll leave it as a rope to which you hang yourself.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure what's happened to your post vza. It has been flagged with the "toxic" sign (!)..Maybe JS-kit is undergoing some changes/updates and messing things up a bit..I see many "Guests" who are well known commentors..
ReplyDeleteThis is ridiculous.. To conflate being a zionist with being a Jew or Jewish is just another trick likely to fool the naive and the "trickable" meant also to enforce the idea that Israel is not a colony established by 19th century Eastern European ideologues but the Jewish homeland of the bible of old..
ReplyDeleteReally? I haven't done anything out of the ordinary.
ReplyDeleteVery strange. Usually JS kit do not flag anything. The old system Haloscan used to stamp this "toxic" sign..I don't know..
ReplyDeleteBy the way, lolling canine..If you promise not to bite at other commenters calves as you used to, I might let you bark every now and then..LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL HAHAHAhahaha..
ReplyDeleteI scanned my system and there is nothing on my end.
ReplyDeleteAs it's a one time off it can just be a glitch
ReplyDeleteI'm going to post a comment at one of your other posts. Tell me what happens, okay?
ReplyDeleteAlright, vza.
ReplyDeleteI sometimes contemplate founding an Anglist movement, demanding that all English natives be permitted to return to Schleswig-Holstein. We would eject the current residents in order to create 'Lebensraum'. All native English, even those of Asian, Afro-Caribbean, etc., origin would qualify as being of Anglian ethnicity, for we would refuse to accept the possibility of dilution of the Anglian bloodline over 1,600 (or so) years.
ReplyDeleteWe Anglists will have to produce literature arguing that present-day Schleswig-Holsteiners are really Slavic incomers who have only lived there for a couple of hundred years.
Our rallying cry will be "Next year in Kiel."
Yup, that's about it..and to think that this sounds mundane if not logical to many astounds me.
ReplyDelete