It is interesting that I posted these photos one time in "Photobucket" and they removed them saying they were "against their policy (so I just posted them in the collective domain)." These types of liberated photos by the thousands need to be flooded into the MSM media, than lets talk about "liberation."
hahahahah You fucking dumbass sandnigger monkey. They are pictures produced 1000 times over for whatever propogandic use there is to "make the west look bad". So typical, you dont bother questionning, you just repost like the fucking idiot you are.
<span>Listen creep, Iraqi Shrimp, this was no invitation for you to do comparisons between the murder of the US Armed forces and your imaginary criminals in Iraq, you use the Iraqis for your delusions like a piece of toilet paper.</span>
So it's cool for the blogger to post 4 year old pics of kids burned by America's military, but it's not cool for me to post newer pics of Iraqi kids murdered by Arab militia who do it in the name of Allah.
No he's not. BTW, I don't see a problem with posting a 4 year old pics for 2 reasons. 1, As a necessary reminder of what it means, concretely, when they mention the word "attack". 2, I never posted them and never saw them before..
Cool with me. Post as many old pics as you like. I had never seen these photos either and your post is indeed a reminder that the US military attacks have maimed and killed innocent people. However, for the sake of clarity, you may want to add a note explaining the date of the photos and how those kids were burned. You're the blogger and you're the boss.
<span>Cool with me. Post as many old pics as you like. I had never seen these photos either and your post is indeed a reminder that US military attacks have maimed and killed innocent people. However, for the sake of clarity, you may want to add a note explaining the date of the photos and how those kids were burned. But it's up to you. You're the blogger and you're the boss. </span>
This is not an issue of "cool," it is an issue of opportunism, holding a position for the wanton murder of over a million people. OK, you want to compare? There is no legitimacy in either murderous activity, either the one enacted by the US nor the ones you speak of - equally dispicable. The person who tries to make one out of the other, is no better than the Israeli system of - we suck, they suck worse, bullshit.
True. All murderous activity is disgusting and wrong. But is it wrong to point out that Iraqis and Afghan civilians have been mass murdered at greater rates by our Arab and Muslim "brothers" than by Americans? Is it wrong to point out that tgia has never posted a pic of an Iraqi child burned by Al Qaeda goons?
I didn't even make that last point, but your angry reaction to the photos I posted is symbolic of the hypocrisy of our Arab "brothers" who pretend to care about Iraqis. Still I thank you for your honesty and condemnation of those who murdered Iraqi children.
<span> "But is it wrong to point out that Iraqis and Afghan civilians have been mass murdered at greater rates by our Arab and Muslim "brothers" than by Americans? Is it wrong to point out that tgia has never posted a pic of an Iraqi child burned by Al Qaeda goons?"</span>
Lies? Did you not know that Iraqi and Afghan civilians have been mass murdered at greater rates by our Arab and Muslim "brothers" than by Americans? Really? I guess I should not be surprised.
''<span>The determination to kill Americans was common to the three bombers interviewed for this article, but is highly unlikely to be fulfilled by all of them.</span> <span> <p> </p><p>Fewer than a quarter of suicide bombers succeed in blowing up coalition forces, who are relatively well shielded behind concrete barriers or the armour plating of their vehicles. </p><p> <span>The bombers are much likelier to be deployed against Iraqi Shi'ites; soldiers, police, officials or even civilians. According to academics who have studied the Sunni insurgency, the main aim is not to avenge the destruction inflicted by US forces, but to broaden the sectarian divide, perpetuate the cycle of hatred and undermine confidence in the ability of the Shi'ite-led government to restore order.'</span>
From a 2006 BBC article: "<span>Although about 80% of insurgent attacks are targeted against coalition forces, the Iraqi population suffers about 80% of all casualties, according to US officials in late 2005."</span>
You need to read the PUBLIC records of what was dropped where in Iraq, and how much. Other than that, you have no leg to stand of for what you are saying, because the same acts were performed by the US forces - indescriminately, and purposefully, on civilians. To TRY to emphasize the hitting of civilians in the context of talking about what was done by the US forces, is to imply by default that this was not done by the US forces. To try to imply that they (US) attack differently is a lie, and anyone, anyone who knows about war understands this - the only people who do not understand this are people who have never been on the battlefield, or liars like the propaganda branches of a said armed forces.
<span>You need to read the PUBLIC records of what was dropped where in Iraq, and how much. Other than that, you have no leg to stand on for what you are saying, because the same acts were performed by the US forces - indescriminately, and purposefully, on civilians. To TRY to emphasize the hitting of civilians by suicide bombers in the context of talking about what was done by the US forces without naming what was done by the US forces, is to imply by default that this was not done by the US forces. To try to imply that they (US) attack differently is a lie, and anyone, anyone who knows about war understands this - the only people who do not understand this are people who have never been on the battlefield and believe in bullshit like clean wars, or liars like the propaganda branches of a said armed forces. </span>
I do not think so, but it seems as though victims of U.S. actions are always more newsworthy and worthy of scorn here. I am pretty certain that 99% of our soldiers would not deliberately try to hurt those children, but the Taliban intentionally and with great planning, set out to kill and maim as many as possible, and strangely there is rarely a word or a photo of their destruction. Sorry, these guys are more than kooks and wackos. They are cold-blooded murderers who killed people for the crime of laughing in public, who committed ethnic cleansing and genocide against the Hazara, who poured acid on school girls' faces, who destroyed hundreds of girls' schools, and murdered teachers. They are doing these things NOW. Surely, we can take a break from our ideological partisanship once in awhile, and acknowledge that these deaths mean something,too.
<span> </span> 93 killed in Pakistan volleyball game suicide blast
<span>I do not think so, but it seems as though victims of U.S. actions are always more newsworthy and worthy of scorn here. I am pretty certain that 99% of our soldiers would not deliberately try to hurt those children, but the Taliban intentionally and with great planning, set out to kill and maim as many as possible, and strangely there is rarely a word or a photo of their destruction. Sorry, these guys are more than kooks and wackos. They are cold-blooded murderers who killed people for the crime of laughing in public, who committed ethnic cleansing and genocide against the Hazara, who poured acid on school girls' faces, who destroyed hundreds of girls' schools, and murdered teachers. Surely, we can take a break from our ideological partisanship once in awhile, and acknowledge that these deaths mean something,too.
<span> </span> 93 killed in Pakistan volleyball game suicide blast
hehehe...I see the Iraqi Football has been getting his ass kissed, and it is dutifully followed up by the hegemony hag vza :)
<span><span>"I do not think so, but it seems as though victims of U.S. actions are always more newsworthy and worthy of scorn here. I am pretty certain that 99% of our soldiers would not deliberately try to hurt those children..."</span></span>
Yes vza, and what is the reason the veterans are killing themselves at record rates? Indeed, the guest has your numbers, perhaps I can add to the guests points?
UNITED STATES OCCUPATION FORCE KILLS 10,000 OR MORE IRAQIS PER MONTH
I especially like the section about "clean war," however I do not post this for the dunderheads who I post against, but for the general public - because we all know that vza hegemeny hag and Iraqi Dufus never believe the truth.
don't go bombing an Iraqi market or hotel, venereal. 3 weeks ago:
<span>Al-Qaida group claims Iraq hotel bombingsWarns on Web site of 'fourth thunderous wave' of attacks to come
<p>An al-Qaida front group in Iraq claimed Wednesday it carried out the deadly bombings against Baghdad hotels earlier this week, boasting how its suicide bombers could breach the extensive Iraqi security, and that even deadlier attacks were to come. </p><p><span></span>The same group, the Islamic State of Iraq, has claimed responsibility for three previous waves of coordinated bombings in Baghdad going back to August. The attacks have hit government offices or high-profile sites in the Iraqi capital. </p><p><span></span>In a statement posted Wednesday on a militant Web site, the al-Qaida group claimed responsibility for the triple suicide blasts on Monday that targeted three hotels favored by Western journalists and security contractors. At least 41 people were killed. </p><p>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35102916/
Oh v, give it a rest. You have overused the International A.N.S.W.E.R. talking points. Try something really novel for a change...such as listening to what the Hazara have to say about the Taliban. I know, their near extinction can't be blamed on either Israel or the U.S. or CAPITALISM but give it a try.
<span>Oh v, give it a rest. You have overused the International A.N.S.W.E.R. talking points. Try something really novel for a change...such as listening to what the Hazara have to say about the Taliban. I know, their near extinction can't be blamed on either Israel, the U.S., or Capitalism, but gee, it looks just a tiny bit odd when you champion ONLY those who are victims of the U.S. and Israel. Seems like </span><span>your humanity is rather discriminatory. </span> <span></span> :(
<span><span>Oh v, give it a rest. You have overused the International A.N.S.W.E.R. talking points. Try something really novel for a change...such as listening to what the Hazara have to say about the Taliban. I know, their near extinction can't be blamed on Israel, the U.S., or Capitalism, but gee, it looks just a tiny bit odd when you champion ONLY those who are victims of the U.S. and Israel. Seems like </span><span>your humanity is rather discriminatory. </span> <span></span> :( </span>
You have no "facts," so you must be speaking about your own condition. If you are so fond of "facts" you would address the myriad that have been in my links and posts. You are interested in fantasy, not facts, unfortunately the facts leave over a million dead Iraqis by direct attack and weakening Iraq's defense, and you cheering the whole massacre/debacle.
Aren't you the one who's been cheering the "resistance" that mass murders Iraqi women and kids, venereal?
I view Iraq from a unique, maybe biased perspective, but I also read other people's opinions and facts. I don't expect you do get it, venereal.
A 2007 article written by two Arabs:
"<span>The bombers are much likelier to be deployed against Iraqi Shi’ites; soldiers, police, officials or even civilians. According to academics who have studied the Sunni insurgency, the main aim is not to avenge the destruction inflicted by US forces, but to broaden the sectarian divide, perpetuate the cycle of hatred and undermine confidence in the ability of the Shi’ite-led government to restore order."</span> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2604119.ece
It is interesting that I posted these photos one time in "Photobucket" and they removed them saying they were "against their policy (so I just posted them in the collective domain)." These types of liberated photos by the thousands need to be flooded into the MSM media, than lets talk about "liberation."
ReplyDeleteno words to describe.
ReplyDeleteYou mean those photos date from a while ago. I found them today on Jews Sans Frontieres and they were saying they were from the latest attack..
ReplyDelete<span>You mean those photos are not new? I found them today on Jews Sans Frontieres and they were saying they were from the latest attack..</span>
ReplyDeletehahahahah You fucking dumbass sandnigger monkey. They are pictures produced 1000 times over for whatever propogandic use there is to "make the west look bad". So typical, you dont bother questionning, you just repost like the fucking idiot you are.
ReplyDeletehahahah and v called you out. Classic.
hahahah did you unban me temporarily so I would be "exposed"??? hahhaah excellent, i knew you would have to eventually!
ReplyDeletetgia check ur email.
ReplyDeleteNOW
ReplyDeletehehehehehe Alert! Alert! Intruder, Intruder! Yasmin is freaking out! hAHHAHAHAHAHA
ReplyDeleteNow Yasmin has removed her comments. Oh the games the troglydytes play... :)
ReplyDelete<span>http://iraqimojo.blogspot.com/2007/05/bombing-markets-in-shia-neighborhoods.html</span>
ReplyDeletehttp://iraqimojo.blogspot.com/2009/04/powerful-photos.html
ReplyDeleteSad that children are caught in the middle.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/rawanews.php?id=18
Listen creep, Iraqi Shrimp, this was no invitation for you to do comparions, you use the Iraqis for your delusions like a piece of toilet paper.
ReplyDelete<span>Listen creep, Iraqi Shrimp, this was no invitation for you to do comparisons between the murder of the US Armed forces and your imaginary criminals in Iraq, you use the Iraqis for your delusions like a piece of toilet paper.</span>
ReplyDeleteSo it's cool for the blogger to post 4 year old pics of kids burned by America's military, but it's not cool for me to post newer pics of Iraqi kids murdered by Arab militia who do it in the name of Allah.
ReplyDeleteAre you venereal?
No he's not. BTW, I don't see a problem with posting a 4 year old pics for 2 reasons. 1, As a necessary reminder of what it means, concretely, when they mention the word "attack". 2, I never posted them and never saw them before..
ReplyDeleteCool with me. Post as many old pics as you like. I had never seen these photos either and your post is indeed a reminder that the US military attacks have maimed and killed innocent people. However, for the sake of clarity, you may want to add a note explaining the date of the photos and how those kids were burned. You're the blogger and you're the boss.
ReplyDelete<span>Cool with me. Post as many old pics as you like. I had never seen these photos either and your post is indeed a reminder that US military attacks have maimed and killed innocent people. However, for the sake of clarity, you may want to add a note explaining the date of the photos and how those kids were burned. But it's up to you. You're the blogger and you're the boss. </span>
ReplyDeleteThis is not an issue of "cool," it is an issue of opportunism, holding a position for the wanton murder of over a million people. OK, you want to compare? There is no legitimacy in either murderous activity, either the one enacted by the US nor the ones you speak of - equally dispicable. The person who tries to make one out of the other, is no better than the Israeli system of - we suck, they suck worse, bullshit.
ReplyDeleteTrue. All murderous activity is disgusting and wrong. But is it wrong to point out that Iraqis and Afghan civilians have been mass murdered at greater rates by our Arab and Muslim "brothers" than by Americans? Is it wrong to point out that tgia has never posted a pic of an Iraqi child burned by Al Qaeda goons?
ReplyDeleteI didn't even make that last point, but your angry reaction to the photos I posted is symbolic of the hypocrisy of our Arab "brothers" who pretend to care about Iraqis. Still I thank you for your honesty and condemnation of those who murdered Iraqi children.
<span> "But is it wrong to point out that Iraqis and Afghan civilians have been mass murdered at greater rates by our Arab and Muslim "brothers" than by Americans? Is it wrong to point out that tgia has never posted a pic of an Iraqi child burned by Al Qaeda goons?"</span>
ReplyDelete<span>It is wrong to post lies
</span>
Lies? Did you not know that Iraqi and Afghan civilians have been mass murdered at greater rates by our Arab and Muslim "brothers" than by Americans? Really? I guess I should not be surprised.
ReplyDelete''<span>The determination to kill Americans was common to the three bombers interviewed for this article, but is highly unlikely to be fulfilled by all of them.</span>
ReplyDelete<span>
<p>
</p><p>Fewer than a quarter of suicide bombers succeed in blowing up coalition forces, who are relatively well shielded behind concrete barriers or the armour plating of their vehicles.
</p><p>
<span>The bombers are much likelier to be deployed against Iraqi Shi'ites; soldiers, police, officials or even civilians. According to academics who have studied the Sunni insurgency, the main aim is not to avenge the destruction inflicted by US forces, but to broaden the sectarian divide, perpetuate the cycle of hatred and undermine confidence in the ability of the Shi'ite-led government to restore order.'</span>
http://iraqimojo.blogspot.com/2007/10/suicide-bombers-head-to-iraq-from.html</p></span>
From a 2006 BBC article: "<span>Although about 80% of insurgent attacks are targeted against coalition forces, the Iraqi population suffers about 80% of all casualties, according to US officials in late 2005."</span>
ReplyDeletehttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5052138.stm
But never a word or a photo about what the Taliban intentionally do all the time.
ReplyDeleteYou need to read the PUBLIC records of what was dropped where in Iraq, and how much. Other than that, you have no leg to stand of for what you are saying, because the same acts were performed by the US forces - indescriminately, and purposefully, on civilians. To TRY to emphasize the hitting of civilians in the context of talking about what was done by the US forces, is to imply by default that this was not done by the US forces. To try to imply that they (US) attack differently is a lie, and anyone, anyone who knows about war understands this - the only people who do not understand this are people who have never been on the battlefield, or liars like the propaganda branches of a said armed forces.
ReplyDelete<span>You need to read the PUBLIC records of what was dropped where in Iraq, and how much. Other than that, you have no leg to stand on for what you are saying, because the same acts were performed by the US forces - indescriminately, and purposefully, on civilians. To TRY to emphasize the hitting of civilians by suicide bombers in the context of talking about what was done by the US forces without naming what was done by the US forces, is to imply by default that this was not done by the US forces. To try to imply that they (US) attack differently is a lie, and anyone, anyone who knows about war understands this - the only people who do not understand this are people who have never been on the battlefield and believe in bullshit like clean wars, or liars like the propaganda branches of a said armed forces.
ReplyDelete</span>
Facts are annoying, aren't they?
ReplyDeletehttp://iraqimojo.blogspot.com/2009/12/12-times-as-many-suicide-bombings-in.html
Ah yes! Religious wackos! I have a soft spot for them..
ReplyDeleteI do not think so, but it seems as though victims of U.S. actions are always more newsworthy and worthy of scorn here. I am pretty certain that 99% of our soldiers would not deliberately try to hurt those children, but the Taliban intentionally and with great planning, set out to kill and maim as many as possible, and strangely there is rarely a word or a photo of their destruction. Sorry, these guys are more than kooks and wackos. They are cold-blooded murderers who killed people for the crime of laughing in public, who committed ethnic cleansing and genocide against the Hazara, who poured acid on school girls' faces, who destroyed hundreds of girls' schools, and murdered teachers. They are doing these things NOW. Surely, we can take a break from our ideological partisanship once in awhile, and acknowledge that these deaths mean something,too.
ReplyDelete<span>
</span>
93 killed in Pakistan volleyball game suicide blast
http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2010/01/01/96006.html
<span>I do not think so, but it seems as though victims of U.S. actions are always more newsworthy and worthy of scorn here. I am pretty certain that 99% of our soldiers would not deliberately try to hurt those children, but the Taliban intentionally and with great planning, set out to kill and maim as many as possible, and strangely there is rarely a word or a photo of their destruction. Sorry, these guys are more than kooks and wackos. They are cold-blooded murderers who killed people for the crime of laughing in public, who committed ethnic cleansing and genocide against the Hazara, who poured acid on school girls' faces, who destroyed hundreds of girls' schools, and murdered teachers. Surely, we can take a break from our ideological partisanship once in awhile, and acknowledge that these deaths mean something,too.
ReplyDelete<span>
</span>
93 killed in Pakistan volleyball game suicide blast
http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2010/01/01/96006.html</span>
hehehe...I see the Iraqi Football has been getting his ass kissed, and it is dutifully followed up by the hegemony hag vza :)
ReplyDelete<span><span>"I do not think so, but it seems as though victims of U.S. actions are always more newsworthy and worthy of scorn here. I am pretty certain that 99% of our soldiers would not deliberately try to hurt those children..."</span></span>
Yes vza, and what is the reason the veterans are killing themselves at record rates? Indeed, the guest has your numbers, perhaps I can add to the guests points?
UNITED STATES OCCUPATION FORCE KILLS 10,000 OR MORE IRAQIS PER MONTH
http://notinhisname.blogdrive.com/archive/cm-07_cy-2007_m-07_d-09_y-2007_o-0.html
BOMBS AWAY OVER IRAQ
http://notinhisname.blogdrive.com/archive/cm-02_cy-2008_m-02_d-10_y-2008_o-0.html
MILITAINMENT
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2373519247173568764&ei=Cvl9S62RDITWqgK2ubnGCA&q=MILITAINMENT&hl=en&emb=1#
I especially like the section about "clean war," however I do not post this for the dunderheads who I post against, but for the general public - because we all know that vza hegemeny hag and Iraqi Dufus never believe the truth.
don't go bombing an Iraqi market or hotel, venereal. 3 weeks ago:
ReplyDelete<span>Al-Qaida group claims Iraq hotel bombingsWarns on Web site of 'fourth thunderous wave' of attacks to come
<p>An al-Qaida front group in Iraq claimed Wednesday it carried out the deadly bombings against Baghdad hotels earlier this week, boasting how its suicide bombers could breach the extensive Iraqi security, and that even deadlier attacks were to come.
</p><p><span></span>The same group, the Islamic State of Iraq, has claimed responsibility for three previous waves of coordinated bombings in Baghdad going back to August. The attacks have hit government offices or high-profile sites in the Iraqi capital.
</p><p><span></span>In a statement posted Wednesday on a militant Web site, the al-Qaida group claimed responsibility for the triple suicide blasts on Monday that targeted three hotels favored by Western journalists and security contractors. At least 41 people were killed.
</p><p>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35102916/
</p></span>
Oh v, give it a rest. You have overused the International A.N.S.W.E.R. talking points. Try something really novel for a change...such as listening to what the Hazara have to say about the Taliban. I know, their near extinction can't be blamed on either Israel or the U.S. or CAPITALISM but give it a try.
ReplyDelete<span>Oh v, give it a rest. You have overused the International A.N.S.W.E.R. talking points. Try something really novel for a change...such as listening to what the Hazara have to say about the Taliban. I know, their near extinction can't be blamed on either Israel, the U.S., or Capitalism, but gee, it looks just a tiny bit odd when you champion ONLY those who are victims of the U.S. and Israel. Seems like </span><span>your humanity is rather discriminatory. </span>
ReplyDelete<span></span> :(
<span><span>Oh v, give it a rest. You have overused the International A.N.S.W.E.R. talking points. Try something really novel for a change...such as listening to what the Hazara have to say about the Taliban. I know, their near extinction can't be blamed on Israel, the U.S., or Capitalism, but gee, it looks just a tiny bit odd when you champion ONLY those who are victims of the U.S. and Israel. Seems like </span><span>your humanity is rather discriminatory. </span>
ReplyDelete<span></span> :( </span>
Yes, and pigs fly when truth comes out of msnbc, but unfortunately Iraqi Retard, these are all of your sources. I feel sorry for you
ReplyDeleteYou are a bore vza, a deadly bore
ReplyDelete:) Awww, go watch a youtube video.
ReplyDeleteYou have no "facts," so you must be speaking about your own condition. If you are so fond of "facts" you would address the myriad that have been in my links and posts. You are interested in fantasy, not facts, unfortunately the facts leave over a million dead Iraqis by direct attack and weakening Iraq's defense, and you cheering the whole massacre/debacle.
ReplyDeleteGet a labotomy, you do not use it anyhow
ReplyDeleteAren't you the one who's been cheering the "resistance" that mass murders Iraqi women and kids, venereal?
ReplyDeleteI view Iraq from a unique, maybe biased perspective, but I also read other people's opinions and facts. I don't expect you do get it, venereal.
A 2007 article written by two Arabs:
"<span>The bombers are much likelier to be deployed against Iraqi Shi’ites; soldiers, police, officials or even civilians. According to academics who have studied the Sunni insurgency, the main aim is not to avenge the destruction inflicted by US forces, but to broaden the sectarian divide, perpetuate the cycle of hatred and undermine confidence in the ability of the Shi’ite-led government to restore order."</span>
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2604119.ece