Anger is a legitimate emotion in the face of injustice. Passive acceptance of evil is not a virtue.
Friday, June 26, 2009
From The Angry Arab: Arab attitudes to Ahmadinajad
The position of Arab intellectual and public sympathy for Ahmadinajad needs to be explained (not justified). It is not that Arabs like Ahdmadinajad per se: but they really hate his enemies so much that they make the choice. The fact that Ahmadinajad's enemies are the regimes of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan, not to mention Israel and the US, endears him to many Arabs. Having said that: I personally don't trust the Iranian regime on the question of Palestine. Remember that it dealt with Israel during the Iran-Iraq war. And if there is one that I distrust and despise most, it is Rafsanjani--who one should remember is the fruit of the Iranian regime itself. If the regime was not corrupt at it core, a Rafsanjani would not have emerged. The genuine Iranian reform movement (and I am not talking about the Allahu Akbar crowd of Mousavi) needs to distance itself from Rafsanjani, just as the Syrian opposition movement (finally) distanced itself from `Abdul-Halim Khaddam. By the way, it is hilarious when Zizek dismisses talk about Ahmadinajad as a leftist (and I of course agree because Ahmadinajad and the Islamic regime don't deserve the label of the left), and then implies that Mousavi or Rafsanjani are leftists. In sum, Neither Ahmadinajad, nor Mousavi or Rafsanjani. Chant after me NOW.
Absolutely, no disagreement here
ReplyDeleteIsrael did help Khomeini in the 1980s fight Saddam. Khomeini and Khamenei stabbed Israel in the back afterwards. Good for the Lebanese one to mention it.
ReplyDeleteMarion,
If you want to find out about the 1953 coups, then please do a google search on:
kashani mossadeq khomeini
There are video clips of Khomeini talking about Mossadeq and Kashani. Some Khomeini allies argue that while it is true that Khomeini was a follower of Kashani in 1953 (the largest Quom Marja at the time), publicly blasted Mossadeq in 1952/1953, and publicly praised the Shah in 1952/1953, this does not automatically prove that Khomenei helped Kashani organize the 1953 pro Shah coup:
http://iranscope.ghandchi.com/Anthology/Kazemzadeh/28mordad.htm
(see Marion, I even provided a link to match your biases.)
However, you will find many other writers who argue that Khomeini indeed did play an active role in the coup, whether solely out of loyalty for Kashani or for other reasons.
Vali Nasr, who you might trust, has a section in his book about how the Quom clerics including Kashani and Khomeini helped the Shah in the 1953 coups. Fareed Zakaria has also written about it. Keep in mind that from the point of view of the clerics, they weren't "working with Mi6 or the CIA." Rather they were working with other Iranians--the Iranian military, Shah and Bazaris--against Mossedeq which they regarded as a threat to Iran and the religious faithful.
Do you ever disagree with the angry one, V?
ReplyDeleteyes, do you have a reason for asking that question?
ReplyDeleteApparently not...lol
ReplyDeleteI just don't remember you disagreeing with him. Oh yes, one time I do.
ReplyDeleteSure :)
ReplyDelete"(see Marion, I even provided a link to match your biases.)"--anand
ReplyDeleteNOt sure what that was supposed to mean anand, what link did you provide that match my biases?
Now maybe you can tell me why you think I should be taking Masoud Kazemzadeh biased word for Imam Khomeini's alleged help in the overthrow of Mossadeq to install the Shah? BY the looks of his past works I do not see him as being an objective source whatsoever when it comes to Imam Khomeini nor the present Iranian government...
And I also do not completely trust Vali Nasr or Fareed Zakaria as I know that they are working for Western interests and therefore they cannot be completely objective...
Do you have any completely objective sources you can
provide...?